Re: [Zope-dev] Recursively adding ZClasses (continued)

2000-06-07 Thread Kevin Dangoor
- Original Message - From: "Rik Hoekstra" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 4:28 AM Subject: [Zope-dev] Recursively adding ZClasses (continued) First I had a problem with nested ZClasses, which got me into trouble when I wanted to ad

Re: [Zope-dev] Recursively adding ZClasses (continued)

2000-06-07 Thread Rik Hoekstra
snip Thanks for replying Kevin, but it won't work ;-( I tried it ALL, and it _will_not_work_. The nested ZClasses will apparently solve it (I used it elsewhere), but it will get you into trouble in other situations - if you want to add an instance of the nested zclass to an existing instance of

Re: [Zope-dev] Recursively adding ZClasses (continued)

2000-06-07 Thread Jason Spisak
Rik Hoekstra writes: This currently adds recursive ZClasses for me. All ZClasses are on the top level of the Product, no nesting: cut out untested dtml-with "PermanentJobClass.createInObjectManager(REQUEST['id'], REQUEST)" dtml-call

Re: [Zope-dev] Recursively adding ZClasses (continued)

2000-06-07 Thread Jason Spisak
Rik Hoekstra writes: Thanks a lot Jason, I'll try it (though i'd swear I tried something very much alike) This currently adds recursive ZClasses for me. All ZClasses are on the top level of the Product, no nesting: dtml-with "manage_addProduct['ZGL']" dtml-with

Re: [Zope-dev] Recursively adding ZClasses (continued)

2000-06-07 Thread Rik Hoekstra
-Original Message- From: Jason Spisak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Rik Hoekstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Kevin Dangoor [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: woensdag 7 juni 2000 22:26 Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Recursively adding ZClasses (continued) Rik Hoekstra writes

Re: [Zope-dev] Recursively adding ZClasses (continued)

2000-06-07 Thread Jason Spisak
Rik Hoekstra: Good to hear you got it. Rik Hoekstra writes: Thanks a lot Jason, I'll try it (though i'd swear I tried something very much alike) It was very much alike, but you were right ;-). The difference was that I did a (sort of cut down pseudocode) dtml-with