On Tuesday 11 February 2003 11:04 pm, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 13:19, Shane Hathaway wrote:
I'm thinking the veto should be added by Connection.commit() and
Connection.setstate() whenever a conflict is about to propagate. What
do you think?
Maybe I don't
On Monday 10 February 2003 8:47 pm, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Great, so there's at least 133 things to examine to see if they
could catch a ConflictError. And I only wrote about 15 of those.
The rest could be very time-consuming to audit.
tal:on-error also catches all exceptions. It could
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 06:11:15PM -0200, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Please, please, please, don't use generic except:. They can cause ZODB
corruption if they catch ConflictErrors.
Can anyone else confirm or deny???
If true, it needs to be much more widely publicized!