Hi,
As I understand it Specialist can't get there attributes from a provider?
For instance, the LoginManager knows about roles and domains,
I would like to get this from attributes but I don't want to be able
to get them from an attribute provider.
In that way I can make a GUI interface th
Tres,
The link to http://cmf.zope.org/Members/jshell/security_info.patch
seems to be broken in the http://cmf.zope.org/download/CMF-1.0beta/README.txt.
Regrads,
Johan Carlsson
> We are pleased to "release version 1.0 beta",
> http://cmf.zope.org/download/CMF-1.0beta of the Zope Conten
> Hi Johan,
>
>Have a look at http://www.zope.org/Members/sspickle/DumbZPatternsExample
>
> The best way I've found is to provide a method (or methods) in the
> Specialist of the contained item to get ids of those instances satisfying certain
> criteria...
>
> e.g., getToDoIdsFor
We are pleased to "release version 1.0 beta",
http://cmf.zope.org/download/CMF-1.0beta of the Zope Content
Management Framework (CMF).
Please review the "release notes":../README.txt and the "known
issues":../ISSUES.txt.
>From the README:
What is the CMF?
The Zope Content Management Fra
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
>
> At 12:39 PM 3/2/01 -0500, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> >This could be achieved by generating a new Python module for each portal
> >instance, but that would mean sys.modules would have to be pre-loaded
> >with the information about each portal instance and that's not the ZO
Hi Johan,
Have a look at http://www.zope.org/Members/sspickle/DumbZPatternsExample
The best way I've found is to provide a method (or methods) in the
Specialist of the contained item to get ids of those instances satisfying certain
criteria...
e.g., getToDoIdsForDoer( aDoer )
(the conta
Hi,
How could containment be implemented with ZPatterns.
Container -n-1- ContainedItem -n-1- ContainedSubItem
I suppose there would be a Containter Specialist
containing a ContainerItem Specialist.
But Specialists retrieve objects by IDs so there would
also be a list of Contain
Hi,
I'm working on a User object that will support
Groups and Groups-to-Roles mappings.
I modeled it a bit and come up with this model:
(I use Coad's constraints notion, putting constraints with the item the constrain)
User -n--n- Role
| n
|
| 1
GroupRoleItem -1- n-
