On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Jeffrey P Shell wrote:
subobjects and calls that. That's probably the right thing, but it is
what's causing the double cataloging, regardless of how the item is
cataloged. Catalog*Aware objects call into the catalog during
manage_afterAdd, and I'm sure that the same
R. David Murray wrote:
I thought that with ZPatterns one was recommended to avoid the
Catalog mixins and instead use something like SteveA's
catalog trigger from ZPAddOns (I think that's the right product
name).
I think it's called TransactionAgents now... or something...
Chris
I'm using Zope 2.5.1b1, CMF from CVS.
I'm having a strange problem when trying to define a custom
__bobo_traverse__, where an Unauthorized exception is raised from
PageTemplates/Expressions.py/restrictedTraverse.
The object's __bobo_traverse__ is simply doing
def __bobo_traverse__(self,
Florent Guillaume wrote:
So I don't understand the different treatments, with bobo_traverse I get
a None container, which makes the validate fail, whereas standard
traversal calls ac_acquire with as a filter validate2, the filters
receives a container, and this validation suceeds.
If
Hi all,
in case someone have same problem as me (see ZCatalog - hiding query
results thread for more info) - I got a solution:
- create a product that subclasses ZCatalog
- in this product overwrite ZCatalog.getobject with
def getobject(self, rid):
foo
obj =
Hi all,
I don't know if it's the right list to post to, but I have the following
problem:
I have several objects (documents, folders etc) that are accessible only
by a certain user role, this objects are cataloged. Now if I query the
catalog the brains of these objects are returned correctly,
Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anybody has any lights on how I can write the __bobo_traverse__ I
need...
I'm assuming you're using TALES traversal as opposed to ZPublisher
traversal, right? It lets you view the objects directly through the
web, doesn't it?
Yes, TALES
The problem with this solution is that you must wake up every object
found, thus negating the performance/memory advantaged of ZCatalog's
lazy result sets.
Since you said (in your other message) that the restriction is by role,
couldn't you just index the roles allowed to view a given object
Very interesting. I think I've read about this somewhere before. The
claim of 4x faster than PostgreSQL raised my brow. It is true that
Gadfly is becoming quite stale, and only supports a *very* limited
subset of SQL. It also would be nice to see something a bit more robust
than just shelve in
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 10:02:22AM -0500, Eron Lloyd wrote:
Very interesting. I think I've read about this somewhere before. The
claim of 4x faster than PostgreSQL raised my brow. It is true that
Gadfly is becoming quite stale, and only supports a *very* limited
subset of SQL. It also would
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 19:57, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 15:33, Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
[...]
The relevant report at sourceforge is:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=105470aid=535905group_id=5470
[...]
Which is (or where can I find) the
Is there a general Database Connection developer's guide? I'm currently
attempting to hack together a user keyed DC system so each authenticated
user gets her own sign-on specific connection to the database. While my work
is proceeding pretty well, I'd like to, well, know what I'm doing. Does
At 10:45 AM 4/2/02 -0600, Ross J. Reedstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scale, as in multiuser? Hardly at all: it's an SQL library that accesses a
single, textbased, flatfile for the entire database.
As a lightweight replacement for gadfly, it looks like it might be pretty
good.
Exactly. I'm
Igor Stroh writes:
That means, users that don't have the permission
to View or Access Content Information can see the brains as well...
You can look how the CMF (Content Management Framework) solves this problem.
Look for allowedRolesAndUsers and the implicit query extension
I was searching for database adaptor, not database adapter. Both
spellings are correct according to m-w.com.
http://www.zope.org/Members/petrilli/WritingADA
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
The problem here seems to be that you are trying to do XML-RPC communication
with a version of Zope that doesn't support XML-RPC out of the box. You
should use a version = 2.4.0 to get this to work. From the output you sent
below, it looks like you're trying to invoke an RPC method call
Fellow bleeding edge Zopers, (Zopesters, Zopeheads, Zopers and Zopists too)
Firstly, I'd like to thank everyone who has worked on the Segfault Saga,
esp. Matthew and Leonardo!
Obviously now that it's fixed, all that's left to do is to make stability a
reality for everybody ;-)
Does anyone
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 04:01:41PM -0500, Eron Lloyd wrote:
On that thought, I'd like to see Zope.org become much more modern, and
reflect the *latest* and *greatest* functionality of Zope. Deprecation of the
hybrid PTK that's used, as well as updating and polishing of the site
regularly.
Adam Manock wrote
Does anyone know of a release timeline for a new bugfix release of Python,
be it 2.1.2a or 2.1.3?
I'm looking at it at the moment - I plan to roll out a version of this today
on some of my ZEO clients and check it's stable. Sometime next week would be
my guess for a
Zope is not handling correct XML-RPC request.
Even the example from http://www.zope.org/Members/Amos/XML-RPC is not
working.
Even worst if a request like this one in the quoted example is send to the
web server it will report information about the local server installation
and the internal
You are running Zope in debug mode (with the -D switch in the start file).
This is the default. Please try running Zope in non-debug mode (remove
the -D switch) and try this again.
- Original Message -
From: Rossen Raykov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
he's testing against zope.org
and the traceback is enclosed html comments, which probably does mean it is
debug mode.
as for the concerns... i leave that to others.
-k
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 12:18 pm, Chris McDonough wrote:
You are running Zope in debug mode (with the -D switch in the
At 01:58 AM 4/3/02 +0200, Magnus Lyckå [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, we expect to see the announcement of a DB-API 2 complient SQLite
driver any day then! :-)
I wish ! :-) Actually, I'd love to try it. But maybe there are some
DB-API-2 experienced folks out there who could do this in their
I'm working with SQLite right now, I find it a very interesting product,
SQLite is tiny, fast,
I think it is fast at least as MySQL but SQLite has TRANSACTIONS and it
easy to install,
for now it needs a python interface based on DB-SIG.
IMO SQLite is a good candidate to replace Gadflay
Jo
24 matches
Mail list logo
