Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-14 Thread Jim Fulton
Dang, that's embarassing. Thanks Tres! On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 23:43 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Hammond wrote: Not on Windows: Windows test failures on Zope trunk http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1931 CMF-trunk runs fine

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-14 Thread Tim Peters
[Tres Seaver] test.py in the root is the likely culprit, as it is mucking with sys.path. Does this patch make the Windows tests pass? - --- test.py (revision 40087) +++ test.py (working copy) @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ if shome: shome = os.path.abspath(shome) else: - -

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/test.py Don't hard-wire forward-slash into sys.path (redux).

2005-11-14 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Tres Seaver wrote: Log message for revision 40092: Don't hard-wire forward-slash into sys.path (redux). Please don't forget to merge this and the previous rev to the Zope 2.9 branch. From now on, both the trunk and the 2.9 branch need to be taken care of. Philipp

[Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9

2005-11-14 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Florent Guillaume wrote: BTW I'm for removing the 2.9 branch for now. You didn't, so I presume 2.9 branch stays? It's important to clear the status of this branch because bugfixes need to be merged to it (see my email about Tres' bugfix, for example). By the way, in the future, just to avoid

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9

2005-11-14 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 15. November 2005 00:20:00 +0800 Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Florent Guillaume wrote: BTW I'm for removing the 2.9 branch for now. You didn't, so I presume 2.9 branch stays? It's important to clear the status of this branch because bugfixes need to be merged

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-14 Thread Paul Winkler
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 02:55:22PM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote: Of course the release manager should have the last say and as the release manager it's totally valid for Andreas to delete the branch. Apologies for taking initiative. I was really just trying to unstick Paul and get things

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9

2005-11-14 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Andreas Jung wrote: --On 15. November 2005 00:20:00 +0800 Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Florent Guillaume wrote: BTW I'm for removing the 2.9 branch for now. You didn't, so I presume 2.9 branch stays? It's important to clear the status of this branch because

[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 fred-win

2005-11-14 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 fred-win. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 1541 Blamelist: philikon BUILD FAILED: failed failed slave lost sincerely, -The Buildbot

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-14 Thread Jim Fulton
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 10:22 -0500, Tim Peters wrote: ... Turns out the Five tests that were failing on Windows also fail on Linux, but the failing tests don't run unless you pass ``--all`` to test.py (which I normally do, but I guess most people don't, in which case most people wouldn't see

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9

2005-11-14 Thread Jim Fulton
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 00:20 +0800, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Florent Guillaume wrote: BTW I'm for removing the 2.9 branch for now. You didn't, so I presume 2.9 branch stays? It's important to clear the status of this branch because bugfixes need to be merged to it (see my email