[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 5 OK

2007-10-02 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Oct 1 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Tue Oct 2 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Mon Oct 1 20:52:19 EDT 2007

[Zope-dev] zope.fssync in Zope 2.11

2007-10-02 Thread Thomas Lotze
I just realized that Zope 2.11.0-a1 contains zope.app.fssync but not zope.fssync. This doesn't make much sense to me given that the former depends on the latter. Is there a good reason for it, should both be included, or none of the two? -- Thomas

[Zope-dev] Re: zope.fssync in Zope 2.11

2007-10-02 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Thomas Lotze wrote: I just realized that Zope 2.11.0-a1 contains zope.app.fssync but not zope.fssync. This doesn't make much sense to me given that the former depends on the latter. Is there a good reason for it, should both be included, or none of the two? Probably an oversight.

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ Merge r80451 from trunk

2007-10-02 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
According to CHANGES.txt, you're fixing a bug. Where's the test that exercises that the bug fix code? (Yes, I'm going to get anal about this.) To anybody, the fix will look a bit dubious. At least I personally am wondering how simply changing the datatype in the ZConfig schema will work... A