Am Montag, den 15.10.2007, 16:38 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake:
> On 10/15/07, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure automated bug expiry is a "very bad thing".
>
> Agreed; it's completely unhelpful.
Think so too.
--
gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle/saal
Hi,
Am Montag, den 15.10.2007, 17:29 -0400 schrieb Erik Rose:
> Here's a little patch that eliminates some duplication in
> getRequiredAdapters(). It changes it to use the
> _adapterishRegistrations() utility function, as getProvidedAdapters()
> does, rather than repeating the ('registeredAd
Here's a little patch that eliminates some duplication in
getRequiredAdapters(). It changes it to use the
_adapterishRegistrations() utility function, as getProvidedAdapters()
does, rather than repeating the ('registeredAdapters',
'registeredSubscriptionAdapters', 'registeredHandlers') tria
On 10/15/07, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure automated bug expiry is a "very bad thing".
Agreed; it's completely unhelpful.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
"Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller
__
Jamu Kakar wrote:
They're related to automated bug expiry.
I'm pretty sure automated bug expiry is a "very bad thing".
What do other people feel?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Oct 14 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Mon Oct 15 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Sun Oct 14 20:51:07 EDT 2007
URL
