On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:24:14 -0500
Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Feb 6, 2009, at 7:35 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
zope.configuration isn't a namespace package. It is simply a
package with subpackages.
Does setuptools support something like:
packagea:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Fri Feb 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Feb 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 10 messages: 10 from Zope Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (failures=6) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Fri Feb 6 21:19:46 EST
Hi there,
We've recently had some discussions on where to place the implementation
of various ZCML directives. This post is to try to summarize the issue
and analyze the options we have.
Right now ZCML directives are implemented in packages that contain other
implementation. For example,
Martijn Faassen wrote:
We've recently had some discussions on where to place the implementation
of various ZCML directives. This post is to try to summarize the issue
and analyze the options we have.
Thanks for summarizing this!
We have several ways to go:
a) continue with the current
Hey Hanno,
Thanks for your feedback!
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
a) continue with the current extra dependencies situation like in
zope.component, and in fact clean up other packages that define ZCML to
declare ZCML extra dependencies.
-1 from me.
[snip
Hi Martijn,
Without comparison otherwise, you may find my thoughts here useful:
http://www.martinaspeli.net/articles/granting-plone-an-api
a) continue with the current extra dependencies situation like in
zope.component, and in fact clean up other packages that define ZCML to
declare ZCML
