This is the summary for test reports received on the
zope-tests list between 2011-04-15 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-04-16 00:00:00 UTC:
See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
http://docs.zope.org/
(Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 02:39:26PM +0200) Hanno Schlichting wrote/schrieb/egrapse:
> > I assume this kind of thing has been discussed and the decision has been
> > taken on judging backwards compatibility vs. the benefits of doing this?
>
> The particular code was unused for several years,
Sigh. So
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 3:36 AM, William Heymann wrote:
> What about developers who build on zope 2.x
> and use it very successfully, what should they switch to?
My personal recommendation would be to either use Django or Pyramid.
If you want to stay even closer to Zope, Grok seems to be the natu
On 16 April 2011 07:00, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
...
> [1] FAILED Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-py2.6 slave-ubuntu64
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-April/038158.html
Looks like a temporary network issue, next run went fine.
...
> __
