On 25 October 2011 17:53, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll try and see if I can understand what might be the right thing to
expect and write a test case for that.
Following up here on the list to get some feedback on the patch I
submitted concerning this issue:
On 7 November 2011 09:17, Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net wrote:
The intention of this package is to see if the implementation of broken
object handling is correct and robust enough to merge into
zope.interface and zope.component themselves. Is this the right
approach? If not why and what
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Hi.
A couple of us came together before the Plone conference to work on
various Zope related topics. We worked on the following areas:
This sounds like it was a very productive sprint.
Thanks for the update.
Jim
--
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 October 2011 17:53, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll try and see if I can understand what might be the right thing to
expect and write a test case for that.
Following up here on the list to get some feedback
[1]FAILED Total languishing bugs for zope2: 4
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052262.html
Wow, only 4?
[2]FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052267.html
Transient buildout
On 11/7/11 10:36 AM, Malthe Borch wrote:
On 7 November 2011 09:17, Ross Pattersonm...@rpatterson.net wrote:
The intention of this package is to see if the implementation of broken
object handling is correct and robust enough to merge into
zope.interface and zope.component themselves. Is this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/2011 08:11 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday, November 07, 2011 07:32:04 AM Tres Seaver wrote:
Same as it ever was: who was it again who feels responsible
for maintenance on z3c.form?
I am maintaining z3c.form, just not the Windows
Hi all,
after having the buildbots green again, I think it would be a good point in
time for a series new ZTK releases:
* 1.0.5 (yes, there are even on the 1.0 branch version updates),
* 1.1.3,
* 1.2c1 (a new release branch from the trunk)
Who is in charge for the ZTK releases?
Is there still
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:52:00PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:14:26PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
I've managed to port zope.schema to Python 3.2 on a branch
(jinty-python3).
It gives up Python 2.5 compatibility and depends on six
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Brian Sutherland
br...@vanguardistas.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:52:00PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:14:26PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
I've managed to port zope.schema to Python 3.2 on a branch
(jinty-python3).
Hi Benji,
On 03/11/2011 12:31, Benji York wrote:
If you will tell me how you wired up Manuel and nose, I'd love to add a
how-to section to the Manuel docs.
The only hiccup is that nose doesn't respect a test_suite function by
default, so I wrote a plugin to make it do the right thing:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com wrote:
after having the buildbots green again, I think it would be a good point in
time for a series new ZTK releases:
* 1.0.5 (yes, there are even on the 1.0 branch version updates),
* 1.1.3,
* 1.2c1 (a new release branch from
[1]FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052312.html
Ye! That one is now green too!
Tres.
--
===
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 01:38:21PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Brian Sutherland
br...@vanguardistas.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:52:00PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:14:26PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
I've managed to
14 matches
Mail list logo
