[Zope-dev] Adding broken/missing support to zope.interface? (was: experimental.broken - Graceful handling of broken interfaces and components in the ZODB)

2012-04-08 Thread Ross Patterson
experimental.broken is working well for me. It greatly aided me in getting through a particularly nasty upgrade allowing me to cleanup the ZCA cruft left by poorly behaved add-ons. I'd like to proceed with adding the core of this to zope.interface and I need the developers/maintainers to weigh

Re: [Zope-dev] [Plone-developers] experimental.broken - Graceful handling of broken interfaces and components in the ZODB

2012-04-08 Thread Ross Patterson
Raphael Ritz r.r...@biologie.hu-berlin.de writes: On 11/7/11 10:36 AM, Malthe Borch wrote: On 7 November 2011 09:17, Ross Pattersonm...@rpatterson.net wrote: The intention of this package is to see if the implementation of broken object handling is correct and robust enough to merge into

Re: [Zope-dev] Adding broken/missing support to zope.interface? (was: experimental.broken - Graceful handling of broken interfaces and components in the ZODB)

2012-04-08 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
Not ZCA/ZODB maintainer, but a big +1 from me. I've also experienced the negative effects of missing code for (marker) interfaces in persistent data. Cheers, Leo On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 22:04, Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net wrote: experimental.broken is working well for me.  It greatly

[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 40

2012-04-08 Thread Zope tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-04-07 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-04-08 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: