[Zope-dev] Relaxing Zope id rules for Zope 4 / Plone 5

2013-02-20 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Currently Zope has two rules for object ids: 1) they must be str instances, and 2) they must only consist of alphanumerics and a few extra characters. I have been playing around recently with trying to relax those rules to allow more flexible object ids, specifically allowing UTF-8 object ids.

Re: [Zope-dev] Relaxing Zope id rules for Zope 4 / Plone 5

2013-02-20 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:57:52AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: I want to propose that we do the following: Allow arbitrary str object ids in Zope 4 based on Dieter's work. Configure standard name choosers, normalizers, etc. used to generate ids for content to create UTF-8 object ids.

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 11, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 4

2013-02-20 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote: This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2013-02-18 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-02-19 00:00:00 UTC: I finally got tired of clicking at the links by hand and wrote a script:

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 11, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 4

2013-02-20 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 04:48:56PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote: [10] FAILED winbot / zope.deprecation_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072621.html Moved to github,

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 11, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 4

2013-02-20 Thread Wichert Akkerman
On Feb 20, 2013, at 15:48 , Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote: This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2013-02-18 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-02-19 00:00:00 UTC: I finally got tired

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 11, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 4

2013-02-20 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/20/2013 09:48 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote: [5]FAILED Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 178 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072600.html Error: Picked: BTrees = 4.0.5 So now zope.annotation requires

[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 15, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 4

2013-02-20 Thread Zope tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2013-02-19 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-02-20 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation:

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 15, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 4

2013-02-20 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote: This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2013-02-19 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-02-20 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the

[Zope-dev] Efficient serving of large files using iterator?

2013-02-20 Thread lists
Hi, I've tried from ZPublisher.Iterators import filestream_iterator return filestream_iterator('/home/chrism/bigfile.xls', 'r') in a method to return a big file to users; however, it doesn't work, are there alternative ways to serve large files to users, serving files that are lying somewhere