On 11/3/11 12:13 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
On 03/11/2011 11:05, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Chris Withersch...@simplistix.co.uk
wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 03/11/2011 09:12, Michael Howitz wrote:
Run both test runners with the option -vv to see which tests are run.
(I did
On 11/7/11 10:36 AM, Malthe Borch wrote:
On 7 November 2011 09:17, Ross Pattersonm...@rpatterson.net wrote:
The intention of this package is to see if the implementation of broken
object handling is correct and robust enough to merge into
zope.interface and zope.component themselves. Is this
On 4/6/11 7:43 PM, Roger wrote:
[..]
I think to protect the form is just a part of a concept.
Another part must be to prevent to inject JavaScript in
user generated content. If an application allows to post
JS in a blog post or comment etc. it should be possible to
use easydmx to read and
Chris Withers wrote:
[..]
Actually, it doesn't. The handling of __bases__ appears to be done in
the functions of the mysterious zope.interface.ro module.
(that ro thing takes the biscuit for obscure naming :-( )
Without having a clue my first guess would be that this means
'Resolution
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hi.
[..]
Thoughts?
+1
Raphael
PS: ... not to mention the 700 add-ons that are out
there for Plone alone ...
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No
AP Meyer wrote:
Is this a known bug?
Yes.
But Dieter fixed in recently in CVS HEAD (I think)
Raphael
Working without automatic refresh is very unhandy ;-)
thanks
Andre
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
