Re: [Zope-dev] Expanded access file (was Re: LoginManager patch consideredharmful)harmful)

2000-07-19 Thread Shane Hathaway
Chris Withers wrote: "Phillip J. Eby" wrote: Maybe, maybe not. I think perhaps the most compelling argument from Digital Creations' viewpoint for having an expanded "access" file might be the simplification of the setup process for customers. And it would also make it easier to:

Re: [Zope-dev] Expanded access file (was Re: LoginManager patch consideredharmful)harmful)

2000-07-19 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 10:15 AM 7/19/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote: Chris Withers wrote: "Phillip J. Eby" wrote: Maybe, maybe not. I think perhaps the most compelling argument from Digital Creations' viewpoint for having an expanded "access" file might be the simplification of the setup process for

[Zope-dev] Expanded access file (was Re: LoginManager patch consideredharmful) harmful)

2000-07-10 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 03:07 PM 7/10/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote: "Phillip J. Eby" wrote: Understood. I'll try to keep that use case in mind. Keep in mind, however, that being able to create a LoginManager is a pretty risky business in a portalish environment - you could potentially get access to