Re: [Zope-dev] Expanded "access" file (was Re: LoginManagerpatch consideredharmful)harmful)

2000-07-19 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 11:09 AM 7/19/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote: >> >> Patch opportunity, perhaps? :) Ty and I would do it, no problem. Heck, >> I've been tempted to do it as a LoginManager function, since Zope doesn't >> pay attention to anything past the first line of the "access" file... > >We would be mos

Re: [Zope-dev] Expanded "access" file (was Re: LoginManagerpatch consideredharmful)harmful)

2000-07-19 Thread Shane Hathaway
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote: > > At 10:15 AM 7/19/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote: > >Chris Withers wrote: > >> > >> "Phillip J. Eby" wrote: > >> > Maybe, maybe not. I think perhaps the most compelling argument from > >> > Digital Creations' viewpoint for having an expanded "access" file > might be >

Re: [Zope-dev] Expanded "access" file (was Re: LoginManagerpatch consideredharmful)harmful)

2000-07-19 Thread Chris Withers
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote: > >You speak in the past tense. This is only a suggestion and a > >possibility. It's not as important as some other feature requests. > > > > Patch opportunity, perhaps? :) Ty and I would do it, no problem. Heck, > I've been tempted to do it as a LoginManager function,