Re: [Zope-dev] RE: Re: svn vs. cvs (some documentation)

2004-10-19 Thread Jim Fulton
Tres Seaver wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: 3. Up to this point, we haven't had to be careful about managing bugfixes across multiple releases. Sure we have. We've had a release branch for some time. Perhaps I should add: The complaint you made earlier today (about bugs fixed on the head, but

Re: [Zope-dev] RE: Re: svn vs. cvs (some documentation)

2004-10-19 Thread Tres Seaver
Jim Fulton wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: 3. Up to this point, we haven't had to be careful about managing bugfixes across multiple releases. Sure we have. We've had a release branch for some time. Perhaps I should add: The complaint you made earlier today (about bugs fixed

Re: [Zope-dev] RE: Re: svn vs. cvs (some documentation)

2004-10-19 Thread Jim Fulton
Tres Seaver wrote: ... Another reason for an activity branch: the work is experimental, and may never be merged; putting on a branch lets others evaluate it without risking stability. Agreed. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (540)