[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Re: The Zope Software Certification Program and Common Repository Proposal

2006-02-21 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 07:15, Andrew Milton wrote: > The proposal currently requires 3rd party code to be handed over to Zope > Foundation[1] AND checked into the ZF svn repository in order to be > 'certified'. You indicated this was indeed the case. That's not true. Phillip and I both negate

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Re: The Zope Software Certification Program and Common Repository Proposal

2006-02-21 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 05:30, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > Anyways, you're welcome to contribute code to the z3base if you'd prefer > a public repository that doesn't require IP handover/sharing. Who knows, > perhaps we'll even manage to implement the ZSCP for some packages there :). Th

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Re: The Zope Software Certification Program and Common Repository Proposal

2006-02-21 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 05:13, Andrew Milton wrote: > Why should Mark Shuttleworth who has plenty of means, hand over IP for > (parts of) SchoolTool? I'm sure he has more than enough ways to protect his > IP. Or are you saying that it makes sense for ZF/ZC to protect him? The reason the School

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Re: The Zope Software Certification Program and Common Repository Proposal

2006-02-21 Thread Stephan Richter
Okay, this discussion is off-topic. I will not respond to it, unless I read about something that relates directly to the proposal. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training __

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Re: The Zope Software Certification Program and Common Repository Proposal

2006-02-21 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 03:57, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > Putting stuff into svn.zope.org *does* have advantages: > > * it's easy to feed packages upstream to Zope for a later inclusion into > a Zope distribution. > > * putting a project/package under the wings of the ZF ensures long-te

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Re: The Zope Software Certification Program and Common Repository Proposal

2006-02-21 Thread Stephan Richter
On Monday 20 February 2006 23:55, Andrew Milton wrote: Wow, you took the following two quotes out of context. > > The Common Repository is *not* a replacement for other high-level > repositories like Plone's or ECM's. It does not aim at assimilating > everything in the wider Zope community. It is

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Re: The Zope Software Certification Program and Common Repository Proposal

2006-02-21 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Andrew Milton wrote: > +---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]-- > | > | > | * putting a project/package under the wings of the ZF ensures long-term > | > | IP protection > | > > | > How? I think my death + 70 years is further away than the death of ZF, or > in > | > fact the de

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Re: The Zope Software Certification Program and Common Repository Proposal

2006-02-21 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Andrew Milton wrote: > +---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]-- > | > | Handing over ownership to the ZF and therefore having signed a > | Contributor Agreement are the terms of the svn.zope.org repository, just > | like that code is to be made ZPL. > > The license part is irre

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Re: The Zope Software Certification Program and Common Repository Proposal

2006-02-21 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Andrew Milton wrote: > +---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]-- > | Andrew Milton wrote: > | > +---[ Stephan Richter ]-- > | > | Hello everyone, > | > | > | > | With the development of Zope 3, the Zope developers committed to a new > | > | development pr