On 1/17/06, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Add to it the fact the zpt@zope.org was due to be retired
> anyway ;)
Though retirement for the list was discussed, it was decided not to
retire it since it was still the best place for implementors to
discuss matters. The implementations i
Dieter Maurer schrieb:
> Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-1-16 19:55 +0100:
...
> I have seen some answers -- though not too many...
>
> Note also that "zpt@zope.org" is a very low activity list.
> For it, a few answers is already a lot...
Add to it the fact the zpt@zope.org was due to be retired
anywa
Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-1-16 19:55 +0100:
> ...
>Well, I brought this issue up on zope-dev to discuss this issue directly.
>but with almost zero feedback :-) Also another related posting to zope-zpt
>got _zero_ anwers.
I have seen some answers -- though not too many...
Note also that "zpt@zop
--On 16. Januar 2006 13:36:32 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are two separate issues here:
1. ZPT backward compatibility.
Are we introdcuting ZPT backward incompatibilities? (Aside from module
paths)?
My original implementation would introduce incompatibilitie
