Erik Enge wrote:
> > call, it won't redirect. So you should be able to achieve the same
> > results just by invoking manage_addImage without including the REQUEST
> > object.
>
> But I have to pass something with the REQUEST, or else it won't add the
> image, right?
I do not think so.
"manage_a
Erik Enge wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Chris Withers wrote:
>
> > Why I'm asking is 'cos it'd be really nice not to have to keep
> > re-writing UI when there's perfectly good stuff available in the
> > management interface, things like add forms, edit forms, etc...
>
> Exactly.
Great, so ho
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Steve Alexander wrote:
> Silly idea: Write a wrapper that you put around the RESPONSE object that
> does its own thing when it is told to redirect. You might have to wrap
> the REQUEST object too, so that it returns a wrapped RESPONSE object.
That would work, but don't you t
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Chris Withers wrote:
> Why I'm asking is 'cos it'd be really nice not to have to keep
> re-writing UI when there's perfectly good stuff available in the
> management interface, things like add forms, edit forms, etc...
Exactly.
> Any ideas or am I missing the point?
You a
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Why I'm asking is 'cos it'd be really nice not to have to keep
> re-writing UI when there's perfectly good stuff available in the
> management interface, things like add forms, edit forms, etc...
>
> However, if you call these from anywhere else, they dump you in the
> m
Erik Enge wrote:
> > call, it won't redirect. So you should be able to achieve the same
> > results just by invoking manage_addImage without including the REQUEST
> > object.
>
> But I have to pass something with the REQUEST, or else it won't add the
> image, right?
This is the problem we've ex
On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> call, it won't redirect. So you should be able to achieve the same
> results just by invoking manage_addImage without including the REQUEST
> object.
But I have to pass something with the REQUEST, or else it won't add the
image, right?
> A conventi
Erik Enge wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I've been browsing through the Zope and Zope-dev archives without finding
> anything related to this, please stop me if it has already been dealt
> with. :)
>
> technical person = someone who doesn't mind fuzzing around with the
>manage_main page
Hi.
I've been browsing through the Zope and Zope-dev archives without finding
anything related to this, please stop me if it has already been dealt
with. :)
technical person = someone who doesn't mind fuzzing around with the
manage_main pages
non-technical person = someone w