Hi Shane
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: zope.app.openidconsumer/ New
library for OpenID auth in Zope 3
Martijn Faassen wrote:
One question: why is this in zope.app? I think there's a consensus
we're trying to pull as much from zope.app as possible.
Is this going to provide a ZMI UI
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Log message for revision 97183:
New library for OpenID auth in Zope 3
Changed:
A zope.app.openidconsumer/
One question: why is this in zope.app? I think there's a consensus we're
trying to pull as much from zope.app as possible.
Is this going to provide a
On Feb 24, 2009, at 3:17 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
One question: why is this in zope.app? I think there's a consensus
we're
trying to pull as much from zope.app as possible.
Is this going to provide a ZMI UI at all? If not, I'd suggest
putting it
in zope.*
I
Jim Fulton wrote:
I agree that it shouldn't go in zope.app. I believe I suggested
putting this in zc.openid, although I'm fine with zope.openid.
I'll rename it to zc.openid.
Shane
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
2009/2/24 Jim Fulton j...@zope.com:
I agree that it shouldn't go in zope.app. I believe I suggested
putting this in zc.openid, although I'm fine with zope.openid.
Why zc? I thought it's only for packages coming from the zope
corporation. Or does Shane works for ZC? :)
--
WBR, Dan Korostelev
Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/2/24 Jim Fulton j...@zope.com:
I agree that it shouldn't go in zope.app. I believe I suggested
putting this in zc.openid, although I'm fine with zope.openid.
Why zc? I thought it's only for packages coming from the zope
corporation. Or does Shane works for ZC? :)
2009/2/24 Shane Hathaway sh...@hathawaymix.org:
Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/2/24 Jim Fulton j...@zope.com:
I agree that it shouldn't go in zope.app. I believe I suggested
putting this in zc.openid, although I'm fine with zope.openid.
Why zc? I thought it's only for packages coming from the
Hi there,
I hope in fact zope.app.* will soon become a dumping ground for
deprecated packages providing legacy ZMI support. Of course that will
need the consensus that the ZMI *is* legacy software. I think do we
already have a consensus that packages that provide other useful
functionality
