At 11:54 AM 7/3/00 +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
>Just a quickie:
>
>If, as the the ZPatterns Wiki states, 'Specialists are not classes',
>then why is there a 'Specialist' python class in the ZPatterns
>distribution?
>
Specialists are instances of the class "Specialist". They are not
themselves cl
Steve Alexander wrote:
> I think you're getting your levels of abstraction confused with your
> meta-levels of abstraction :-)
Confused? when talking about ZPatterns?
n e v e r ;-)
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.o
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Just a quickie:
>
> If, as the the ZPatterns Wiki states, 'Specialists are not classes',
> then why is there a 'Specialist' python class in the ZPatterns
> distribution?
ZClasses are coded (implemented) using Python classes, and each instance
of a ZClass represents a pa
Just a quickie:
If, as the the ZPatterns Wiki states, 'Specialists are not classes',
then why is there a 'Specialist' python class in the ZPatterns
distribution?
cheers,
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/
