Chris McDonough wrote:
[snip]
It tries to address the following problem.
Currently people seem to get wrapped around the axle and confused by the
purpose of the ZCA, which currently implies at least two different things:
- Machinery to perform complex registrations and lookups using
Chris McDonough wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
If some set of ZCA APIs made it the responsibility of the *caller* to
invoke
the adapter with arguments would go a long way between normalizing the
difference between utilities and adapters (because they would essentially
then
be the same
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
If some set of ZCA APIs made it the responsibility of the *caller* to
invoke
the adapter with arguments would go a long way between normalizing the
difference between utilities and adapters (because they would
Chris McDonough wrote:
If some set of ZCA APIs made it the responsibility of the *caller* to invoke
the adapter with arguments would go a long way between normalizing the
difference between utilities and adapters (because they would essentially
then
be the same thing).
The very core
On Nov 25, 2009, at 5:08 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
If some set of ZCA APIs made it the responsibility of the *caller* to
invoke the adapter with arguments would go a long way between normalizing
the difference between utilities and adapters (because they would
