On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 22:55 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag 28 August 2008 02:35:28 schrieb Marius Gedminas:
> >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:15:48PM -0700, Stephan Richter wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> This means tha
Hi Martin
> Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.form - extraction from sequence widget
>
> Hi Roger,
>
> >> Btw., it is possible to have a three-state widget for
> booleans, such
> >> as a drop-down widget, that includes "True/False/None",
> although
Hi Roger,
>> Btw., it is possible to have a three-state widget for
>> booleans, such as a drop-down widget, that includes
>> "True/False/None", although it may not make much sense.
>
> No that's not possible! Because you can't save anything
> then False or True in a Bool field.
Really? How is
Martin Aspeli schrieb:
> Marius Gedminas wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:15:48PM -0700, Stephan Richter wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Martin Aspeli wrote:
[...]
>> Wait a second, maybe I'm misunderstanding this, but I certainly oppose
>> any change that would make an unchecked chec
Hi Hermann
> Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.form - extraction from sequence widget
[...]
> > I think you *could* interpret it so that a boolean field that's
> > required really means "you have to tick this box" (e.g. an
> "I agree to
> > these terms
Am Donnerstag 28 August 2008 17:45:58 schrieb Marius Gedminas:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 05:26:20PM +0200, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag 28 August 2008 10:14:11 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
> > > What about the case when you have a list of options of which you need
> > > to chose one or mo
Am Donnerstag 28 August 2008 23:55:24 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
> Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag 28 August 2008 02:35:28 schrieb Marius Gedminas:
> >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:15:48PM -0700, Stephan Richter wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> This mean
Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 28 August 2008 02:35:28 schrieb Marius Gedminas:
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:15:48PM -0700, Stephan Richter wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Martin Aspeli wrote:
This means that if the request contains the empty-marker only (no
selection
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Thursday 28 August 2008, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> I suspect that we just need widget.SequenceWidget in z3c.form to have a
>> special case for len(self.terms)==1, i.e. it's a checkbox with only one
>> option, or maybe a special case for a BooleanField, or indeed have
>> di
On Thursday 28 August 2008, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> I suspect that we just need widget.SequenceWidget in z3c.form to have a
> special case for len(self.terms)==1, i.e. it's a checkbox with only one
> option, or maybe a special case for a BooleanField, or indeed have
> different widgets for Boolean a
Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 28 August 2008 10:14:11 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
>> Marius Gedminas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:15:48PM -0700, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> This means that if the request contains the empty-mar
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 05:26:20PM +0200, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 28 August 2008 10:14:11 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
> > What about the case when you have a list of options of which you need to
> > chose one or more? In that case, ticking none is a validation error.
>
> Yes, in your
On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > I think you have a point. Have you tried changing the behavior to
> > return "default" and see what tests fail? If no major failures come out
> > of this, I would say change it.
>
> Wait a second, maybe I'm misunderstanding this, but I certain
Am Donnerstag 28 August 2008 10:14:11 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
> Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:15:48PM -0700, Stephan Richter wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> >>> This means that if the request contains the empty-marker only (no
> >>> selection w
Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:15:48PM -0700, Stephan Richter wrote:
>> On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>>> This means that if the request contains the empty-marker only (no
>>> selection was made) for a checkbox widget (say), then the return value
>>> is [],
Am Donnerstag 28 August 2008 02:35:28 schrieb Marius Gedminas:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:15:48PM -0700, Stephan Richter wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> > > This means that if the request contains the empty-marker only (no
> > > selection was made) for a checkbox wi
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:15:48PM -0700, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> > This means that if the request contains the empty-marker only (no
> > selection was made) for a checkbox widget (say), then the return value
> > is [], rather than default (NOVAL
On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> This means that if the request contains the empty-marker only (no
> selection was made) for a checkbox widget (say), then the return value
> is [], rather than default (NOVALUE).
>
> Is that a bug? I have a custom checkbox widget derived from the
Hi,
In z3c.form.widget.SequenceWidget, we have:
def extract(self, default=interfaces.NOVALUE):
"""See z3c.form.interfaces.IWidget."""
if (self.name not in self.request and
self.name+'-empty-marker' in self.request):
return []
value = self.
19 matches
Mail list logo
