On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote: ... > I also committed a foul by unilaterally moving buildout development to > github. This was originally just a fork for buildout 2, but helpers wanted > to move 1 development there too and, well ... helpers. :) > Anyway, the move of buildout to github wasn't a secret.
My foul was even greater than I thought. I didn't change the license (and don't particularly want to except...) and yet I carelessly let a non-zope-contributor become a buildout developer. https://github.com/buildout Honestly, I wasn't even thinking in these terms and should have been. I probably should have truly forked buildout if I wanted to be free from the restriction of having only zope contributors. Maybe I still should. buildout probably shouldn't have been in the zope repo to begin with. It so happens that the one non-zope-contributor is planning to become a zope contributor, we'll soon be in the state that all of the buildout developers are contributors again. Jim -- Jim Fulton http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
