Chris Withers wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk
wrote:
...is currently useless, as far as I can see.
I thought the -p option was an artifact of zdaemon, which zopectl just
didn't support. I took it as a case of the lower
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
...is currently useless, as far as I can see.
I thought the -p option was an artifact of zdaemon, which zopectl just
didn't support. I took it as a case of the lower level API's leaking
...is currently useless, as far as I can see.
This stops you specifying a different location for runzope, which is
handy if you're doing buildout-based stuff that uses a deployment.
I think the attached patch fixes this, but I'm wondering:
- are these are tests for this area
- why does
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
...is currently useless, as far as I can see.
I thought the -p option was an artifact of zdaemon, which zopectl just
didn't support. I took it as a case of the lower level API's leaking
through.
I think the attached
