At 01:56 PM 5/25/00 +0400, Jephte CLAIN wrote:
>
>When I don't wrap items like this, I get strange unauthorized errors.
>Only the super user can use the items. All the other users (Managers or
>not) can't.
In normal usage, one only accesses a rack from or in a Specialist.
Specialists wrap the obj
"Phillip J. Eby" a écrit :
> >So: retrieveItem, createItem use vanilla objects
> retrieveItem and createItem are not intended to be public methods; the only
> reason they don't begin with an "_" is that I wanted to make it possible
> for them to be implemented as DTMLMethods or PythonMethods.
you
At 05:33 PM 5/24/00 +0400, Jephte CLAIN wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I believe items got from a rack have to be wrapped in context of the
>rack. I've been bitten by this (and it hurts!). When I try to use items
>from DTML, only the superuser can use it, even managers can't access the
>objects. When I wrap th
Hello,
I believe items got from a rack have to be wrapped in context of the
rack. I've been bitten by this (and it hurts!). When I try to use items
from DTML, only the superuser can use it, even managers can't access the
objects. When I wrap the items in the context of the rack, everything is
fin
