RE: [Zope-dev] un-own an object

2001-04-16 Thread Tim McLaughlin
AM To: Tim McLaughlin Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] un-own an object Ah well :-S Never been much fo a ZClass fan myself, anyway :-S good luck, Chris Tim McLaughlin wrote: except for in my case the user itself is an instance of a ZClass (see ZUserFolder). so it seems an impasse. I can do

RE: [Zope-dev] un-own an object

2001-04-14 Thread Dieter Maurer
Tim McLaughlin writes: my problem is that I need to be able to construct a zclass built by a user who no longer exists. My suspicion is that "nobody" does not have those privileges, and so it seems that I may be SOL :-( My memory says: everything under "control_panel" (this includes

Re: [Zope-dev] un-own an object

2001-04-13 Thread Chris Withers
"R. David Murray" wrote: Like I said (and the docs say), it is the interesection of the two sets of privileges, so it is effectively just the permissions of user nobody. This isn't very useful though ;-) I ended up re-creating a whole folder tree just because I wanted to delete the user

RE: [Zope-dev] un-own an object

2001-04-13 Thread Tim McLaughlin
PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Zope-dev] un-own an object you can always do a copy and delete to take ownership... (albeit that may cause other probs...) my problem is that I need to be able to construct a zclass built by a user who no longer exists. My suspicion is that "nobody" does not

Re: [Zope-dev] un-own an object

2001-04-13 Thread Chris Withers
I meant create an instance of a ZClass owned by a user who no longer exists (if my 'construct' word made no sense - haven't had coffee yet ;-) ). Well, the other option is that you can create a user with the same name and the manager role... cheers, Chris

Re: [Zope-dev] un-own an object

2001-04-12 Thread R. David Murray
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Tim McLaughlin wrote: Ok, so imagine a DTML method has an owner, and as the docs say the method can do no more than the authenticated user and the owner's permissions combined. So, now delete the owner. No, it is the *intersection* of the two ownership sets, not the