Hi Laurence. I reverted to 0.2 and I am good to go. I will upgrade to
0.3 when dobbin can use beta0.5.3. Many thanks.
Regards,
David
Laurence Rowe wrote:
zope.sqlalchemy specifically requires a SessionExtension hook added in
0.4.7 and 0.5.0b3 to fix a bug that came to light in porting dobbin
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 01:55:44PM -0400, Benji York wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just decided to jettison IAbsoluteURL and make a new interface
ICanonicalURL. The adapters for ICanonicalURL are available anywhere
without specially
On May 28, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
Engine configuration is a subset of session configuration. You
cannot have a single ScopedSession for a package if you want to have
multiple instances of that application. We must work with unbound
metadata if we have this goal. That
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 07:10:16PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
I'm not sure whether it would be a good idea to wrap this in a session
property, or just register it as an adapter. The only other object that
would need access to the session (either as a property or through
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 03:49:46PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Brian Sutherland wrote:
[snip]
I'll note that there is a difference between where things are published
(IAbsoluteURL) and where you should go to find their canonical
representation.
One problem I've found with using
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just decided to jettison IAbsoluteURL and make a new interface
ICanonicalURL. The adapters for ICanonicalURL are available anywhere
without specially wrapping the object in a location proxy.
IAbsoluteURL doesn't
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess one difference here is that it seems more common in the RDB scenario
to have multiple ways to reach the same object, and even if you just publish
one, you can get to the actual object in multiple ways.
In this
On May 30, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
Michael Bayer wrote:
[snip discussion on BoundMetadata I don't comprehend yet but
probably should :)]
As far as ScopedSession, it's really just a thread local variable.
Like any global threadlocal, you can stick whatever you
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 09:30:18PM +0100, Laurence Rowe wrote:
Brian Sutherland wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:39:39PM +0100, Laurence Rowe wrote:
We need to differentiate between the interface for session configuration
and session usage from an application.
For session usage I think it
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:39:39PM +0100, Laurence Rowe wrote:
We need to differentiate between the interface for session configuration
and session usage from an application.
For session usage I think it is fairly simple. We should define an
ISessionContext interface such that:
class
--On 9. Mai 2008 11:20:31 +0100 Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need an svn checkout of SQLAlchemy until 0.4.6 is released.
Laurence
Great, that worked and made all tests pass.
Andreas
pgpEracgwI4qR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
On May 7, 2008, at 7:08 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there (especially Christian),
I think we can work with explicits saves. In many cases the user
won't have to worry about it anyway as the container object will do
it for them (besides making the relation), or this 'query container'
On May 7, 2008, at 1:29 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
I'm thinking more about having the same classes mapped to different
databases at different points in the application. Imagine a
departmental address book app. Intstances of the departmental
address book are created for each department, each
On May 7, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
When the generic address book application is built you don't know
what the departments will be called or indeed how many departments
there are. An address book is not be a great example, but I know of
intranet portal sites where this is a
On May 6, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
One thing I understood from Christian Theune is that with scoped
sessions, explicit session.save() is not always necessary. Since I
see it being used here, could you perhaps comment on this?
Registering a mapper
Hi,
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:53:05PM -0400, Michael Bayer wrote:
On May 6, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
One thing I understood from Christian Theune is that with scoped
sessions, explicit session.save() is not always necessary. Since I
see it being
On May 6, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey Michael,
Thanks for the input!
Michael Bayer wrote:
[snip]
So I've already not liked save_on_init for a couple of years due to
its inherent intrusiveness, and because SA historically does not
like being in the business of providing
17 matches
Mail list logo
