In my experience, getItem will return None if *anything* goes wrong
with data retieval or object creation. Sometimes you get a traceback in
the STUPID_LOG, and sometimes you don't (and I haven't figured out the
pattern yet). Test everything you can independently, and simplify
everything
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:18:52PM +0100, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
Hi guys,
some people have asked me to use INSTANCE_HOME instead of SOFTWARE_HOME,
which breaks their products on debian distros.
Now, I'm not sure that won't break other systems if I change it; anyone
care to share?
Chris McDonough wrote:
That's one use, which is important to you. Another is to
use Emacs or Dreamweaver on a representation of, for
example, DTML methods on a filesystem, which is important to
other folks.
I think there is really only one issue nobody has been able to sort out:
do we want
I hadn't thought of the issues you raise. Thanks for mentioning them.
"John D. Heintz" wrote in part:
If we
standardize "properties" to an XML file, then optionally dump other
files to expose specific aspects of an instance for serialized editing
it might not be as big a problem as I was
I think there is really only one issue nobody has been able to sort out:
do we want the objects to be actually stored on the filesystem or do we
want to be able to mirror a ZODB? Or do we want both?
My conception of it is that objects won't be served from the filesystem, but
just put in a
Fred Wilson Horch wrote:
I hadn't thought of the issues you raise. Thanks for mentioning them.
These are issues that may very well affect everyone and I'm happy to
share my thoughts.
I guess I would suggest that the serialized form of a Zope instance by
default would be a single XML
Chris McDonough wrote:
I think there is really only one issue nobody has been able to sort out:
do we want the objects to be actually stored on the filesystem or do we
want to be able to mirror a ZODB? Or do we want both?
My conception of it is that objects won't be served from the
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Roch'e Compaan wrote:
In all simplicity I still can't get it to work but here's some more info
from the console:
Traceback (innermost last):
File
C:\PROGRA~1\ZOPE230\lib\python\Products\ZPatterns\AttributeProviders.py,
line 335, in _AttributeFor
How useful/difficult would it be to put the SMB protocol on top of a ZEO
server? As serialized formats are build, would this be useful to anyone?
I'm not sure how hard it would be, although currently ZEO servers need not
know about anything but strings (they don't necessarily need the code
I wonder if you can kick off another thread?
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Ellguth" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 1:52 PM
Subject: [Zope-dev] Starting a new process
Hi,
I have a lengthy operation in an external method.
I takes up to 2
Hi,
I have a lengthy operation in an external method.
I takes up to 2 minutes.
How do I prevent the browser from timing out?
At the moment I am creating a new process by calling "os.fork()"
and have that operation done in that new process.
At the end I call "sys.exit(0)". This worked fine with
Hi Roche,
In all simplicity I still can't get it to work but here's some more info
from the console:
Traceback (innermost last):
File
C:\PROGRA~1\ZOPE230\lib\python\Products\ZPatterns\AttributeProviders.py,
line 335, in _AttributeFor
(Object: GAPMixin)
File
snip, regarding aq_chain
So nobody (including the various Products I have installed) uses this
incredibly useful attribute. I have numerous places in my source where I
loop through aq_parent attributes.
A good question is whether aq_chain really should be a
public interface. It was
13 matches
Mail list logo
