On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 23:13:54 -0500, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ah ok... yeah, there were reportedly several leaks in the compiler stuff
that have been fixed in CVS. I imagine that's what this is.
Is the compiler still based on bytecodehacks? If so, I dont think this
is a bug
As
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:16:09 -0500, Casey Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That SiteRoot should also be a callable object
(if it exists) returning the Root folder of the sub-site. Now this may
already be the case, but if not I thought it might be worthwhile.
That makes sense for the simple
Hi all. The Virtual Host Folder I released currently has a lot of the
features you want, and is getting a number of other ones. I think it is
worth a look, but then, that's just me. It replaces the VHM. I need to
specify the interface, such as it is, but ...
1) The currently released one is
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
MTK == Matthew T Kromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MTK A side effect of shutting off the garbage collector is that you
MTK can have some storage leaks. We're working on being able to
MTK re-enable the garbage collector so that you don't exhaust
MTK memory over
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
On Tue, 2001-12-18 at 13:44, Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
Soo... if shutting off GC extends time between crashes for some folks
from every 15 minutes to 3 times a day, my advise is to shut off GC.
Now I can really confirm that gc.disable() is enough to avoid the
On Tue, 2001-12-18 at 14:25, Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
[...]
Keep in mind that the leaks you may experience are directly related to
what code you run, and whether or not they introduce cycles. Some of
the restricted python compiler code did/does create cycles under the
assumption that
CM == Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CM Ah ok... yeah, there were reportedly several leaks in the
CM compiler stuff that have been fixed in CVS. I imagine that's
CM what this is.
Actually, I don't think the leaks haven't been fixed in CVS. It would
be at best painful to try
Jeremy Hylton wrote
Actually, I don't think the leaks haven't been fixed in CVS. It would
be at best painful to try and get the compiler code to work without
cycle GC. I really don't want to have to do it.
In that case, there should probably be a readme note or similar saying if
you're
Oh, ok, sorry for the misreport. It sounds then as if we need to fix
whatever is causing the memory corruption that GC trips over. I dont
know that we have a real good handle on what this is.
Note that in the meantime, folks who turn off gc in order to work
around the issue who are having
I need a to create a simple counter variable that will store the number of
iterations by a dtml-in structure. I have yet to find a way how to do
this in zope. Here is an example (in perl) of what I need to do:
@bar = (sara,jane,kate);
foreach $foo (@bar) {
print $foo\n;
$counter
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 10:11, Jon Erickson wrote:
I need a to create a simple counter variable that will store the number of
iterations by a dtml-in structure. I have yet to find a way how to do
this in zope. Here is an example (in perl) of what I need to do:
The number of iterations
I will need to use the $counter variable later on in the script.
Oh sorry, forgot that one...
Inside your loop, you can do:
dtml-if sequence-end
dtml-call REQUEST.set('counter',_['sequence-number'])
/dtml-if
But then again, this would only give the _total_ number of iterations that
have
Hi,
has anybody integrated/plans on intragration/experimented with
OpenOffice and Zope ?
- OpenOffice as a HTML Editor / Web-Frontend for Zope
or
- OpenOffice as a HelperTool in the Background (external converter for
MS Office Products) of Zope
Special interests in turning excel-spreadsheets
This must be a simple issue, but I can't get objects that I create from
custom ZClasses to be visible to Anonymous. In fact they are only
visible to the SuperUser. I have granted every permission I can find,
and tried every possible combination with proxy roles.
I have wasted almost 2 days on
No, unfortunately, I haven't deleted any users. But thanks for
responding :)
The permissions settings cascade downward through the directory
structure, so I would think that if I grant Anonymous every permission
in every folder and every method all the way down through the ZClass
definition and
Steve rocks!
It wasn't actually the Ownership, but when I looked at the object I
realized that I did not expose the Ownership tab, or the Security tab
for the objects that I had created from the ZClass. When I created those
views, I found that the permissions for the objects were not set
16 matches
Mail list logo
