Re: [Zope-dev] Bad Marshal Data

2002-03-28 Thread Toby Dickenson
On 27 Mar 2002 16:25:27 -0300, Leonardo Rochael Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 08:19, seb bacon wrote: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/Zope-2.5.1b1-src/lib/python/OFS/Application.py, line 531, in import_product product=__import__(pname,

Re: [Zope-dev] OpenSSH configuration between ZEO clients storage server

2002-03-28 Thread Adam Manock
At 12:01 PM 3/27/02, Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote: Shane Hathaway wrote: But you don't need reliability compensation to multiplex. SSH assumes the transport layer is reliable. So an SSH tunnel and an SSL tunnel are virtually synonymous. They're not really, but yeah, I was wrong :) A SSL

[Zope-dev] [Zope Crash Solution] Positive Report

2002-03-28 Thread Stefano Noferi
Hi Zopers! Thanks all for your time, especially to Matthew and Leonardo. My patched Python/Zope systems run well now in multi-threads mode. I tested with very hard Python Scripts too and my report is at all positive. My relief is great, like many others zopers, I think ; ) Thanks again and

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope Crash Solution] Positive Report

2002-03-28 Thread Matthew T. Kromer
Stefano Noferi wrote: Hi Zopers! Thanks all for your time, especially to Matthew and Leonardo. My patched Python/Zope systems run well now in multi-threads mode. I tested with very hard Python Scripts too and my report is at all positive. My relief is great, like many others zopers, I think ;

Re: [Zope-dev] OpenSSH configuration between ZEO clients storage server

2002-03-28 Thread Oliver Bleutgen
Adam Manock wrote: Yes. The best solution would be for the ZEO protocol to support auth and crypto natively... The next best solution (while you wait) is to use CIPE ;-) As far as I understand it, even regular TCP port forwarding is TCP over TCP and suffers from the unreliable carrier