Yuan-Chen Cheng wrote:
Patch to
lib/python/TreeDisplay/TreeTag.py
Zope 2.5.1
So that when use virtual host monster, tree icon will appear.
Please put this in the collector so it doesn't get lost:
http://collector.zope.org/Zope
cheers,
Chris
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
code base. unfortunately, the semantics differ widely from the accepted
standards for putting information like parameters at the top of the
file. his syntax is all different :/
I find this comment quite annoying. What are these 'accepted standards' you
speak of? Where
James Johnson wrote:
Hi Chris,
Is there a way to get the fszsqlmethod working on win32 with zope
2.5.1 and cmf1.2 or 1.3?
They work fine.
I've placed dtml-comments around the sql.
Why? ;-)
How
do I supply the connection id?
I've just added docs:
I know I'm late in on this thread, but I thought I'd throw in my views.
I'd like to see the REQUEST be flat plain aborted when someone hits the stop
button or the connection dies.
I don't is the is context.REQUEST.RESPONSE.isClientConnected() really working.
How would I plug this in an
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have a question for you zope administrators out there :
What are your experiences whith zope running on Windows NT/2K? No matter
what I try , zope will run significant faster on a Unixlike system
(with the same hardware), especially when working alot with
I did try to put it there.
I didn't have account there.
What I got is: (sorry for the mass as I cut and paster from mozilla)
---
Site Error
An error was encounter while publishing this resource.
You are not authorized to
Chris Withers wrote:
I know I'm late in on this thread, but I thought I'd throw in my views.
This is very nice, it seemed like nobody was interested in that.
I'd like to see the REQUEST be flat plain aborted when someone hits the
stop button or the connection dies.
Yes, that would be the
Oliver Bleutgen wrote:
Mod_perl also seems _not_ to stop a long running script if this script
doesn't try to write to the RESPONSE (or whatever they call it). The
perl test script I posted does write output, and this causes it to stop.
If I try a script with no output, it never gets
Steve Alexander wrote:
Oliver Bleutgen wrote:
Although Zope has a response stream method of sending information back
to the client, most things in Zope don't use it.
Instead, the response information is aggregated, converted into a
string, and then sent back all at once at the
Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 07:49, Chris Withers wrote:
I'd like to see the REQUEST be flat plain aborted when someone hits the
stop button or the connection dies.
Thats probably impossible if there is an HTTP proxy between your browser and
zope.
Why?
It seems logical
On Wednesday 28 Aug 2002 4:04 pm, Oliver Bleutgen wrote:
Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 07:49, Chris Withers wrote:
I'd like to see the REQUEST be flat plain aborted when someone hits the
stop button or the connection dies.
Thats probably impossible if there is an HTTP proxy
Adrian Hungate wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have a question for you zope administrators out there :
What are your experiences whith zope running on Windows NT/2K? No matter
what I try , zope will run significant faster on a Unixlike system
(with the same hardware), especially when
One thing to remember is that running multi-treaded Python apps on a
multi-processor box is suboptimal unless you can bind all the threads to a
single processor, due to the Python GIL.
So, I'm not surprised that a 800MHz Athlon outperforms a dual 1GHz Piii with
Zope, regardless of OS. As for
I'm not sure that is the case you know. Oracle 9i Linux is faster on my
Linux Athlon 800 than the same release on my Win2k Dual Piii 1GHz.
Also my Win box has 1Gb ram, while my Linux box has only 512Mb...
In other news Apache is reported to run faster on Linux that Win2000,
as is
TD == Toby Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
although we may do one more beta release to add some performance
improvements.
TD Do you have something specific in mind?
I'd like to change this bit of code in handle_write():
if n len(v):
# XXX It's
FWIW, I just checked in a signal handler to the trunk that makes it
possible on UNIX to do kill -USR1 `cat var/Z2.pid` and pack the
database to 0 days, so all this business about packing TTW and whether
you need to let the browser wait or not is for naught. ;-)
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 07:49, Chris
For what its worth, a long time ago, with an ancient version of Zope running
on the original W2k Professional on my home machine (minus any service
packs), Zope (running as a service) was magnitudes of order slower after
coming back from a system Hibernate; I no longer hibernate/power-manage
This, however, is almost an order of magnitude difference, and may need
further investigation...
Adam
ThereĀ“s also a difference between Win2000 and Win2000 Server. The Server
version is optimised for network and system operations(thread/memory
allocation) and really much faster than the
I wouldn't say so. I used to run Zope on a Win2k A/S and the perf was not
noticably better than on a similar Pro machine.
Adrian...
--
Adrian Hungate
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.haqa.co.uk
- Original Message -
From: Arndt Droullier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, I believe that NT Workstation ran dynamic web apps better than NT
server. This was because the tuning on NT server out of the box was really
geared toward file-server type applications. I assume the case is the same
with win2k. At that, I don't think is would be noticeable enough,
20 matches
Mail list logo