[Zope-dev] Attract the opposite SEX fle pjuyzwnnogas kj
Zope-dev-admin i found a great deal! SEX ATTRACTING PHEROMONES!! AVAILABLE HERE!!FOR MEN OR WOMEN!!LOOK HERE FOR MORE INFO!! xcvcompticnkdafnqhie fvyijn lkxdx jih w lhfzbyt zREMOVE FROM MAILLIST upfgit ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Catalog performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just my 2 cents observation... I ran this code and monitored the page "Cache extreme detail" in ZMI > ControlPanel > DebugInfo. With this method, the object was not loaded. However the intermediate objects that the unrestrictedTraverse() passed by were loaded into memory. e.g. If doc.getPath() is '/x/y/z/myobject', myobject was not loaded but x, y, and z were loaded into memory. This is a good point, and for catalog based retrievals of objects may be difficult (but not impossible) to avoid excess objects remaining in the cache. If however you are doing a walk of part of your ZODB tree (unlike 'randomly' accessing objects from the ZODB like this) you could ensure that you do a depth first traversal, then as you come back up the tree, traversed nodes that weren't active before the walk would be deactivated. eg something like this external method : def traverseTree(self): ''' Traverse the tree and do something. ''' was_ghost = self._p_changed is None for ob in self.objectValues(): traverseTree(ob) # XXX Do something with self here : self.doSomething() if was_ghost:self._p_deactivate() This should ensure that any 'traversed over' nodes that were previously not active are de-activated. JB. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] PCGI-Problem
On Friday 19 September 2003 04:31 am, Andre Schubert wrote: > On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:32:52 +0200 > Andre Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > i have a little problem. > > We have several Zope's running in our company. > > Versions are 2.5.1,2.6.1,2.6.2. All are running on Redhat Linux. > > All versions have the same problem, if i access them via pcgi and hit the Restart > > button in the Control Panel then the server goes down. > > If i do the same via ZServer port 8080 everything works fine. > > > Hi all, > > i think i have found a solution. > A patch is included for PCGIServer.py. > Could anybody check this patch please. > If there are no problems i could file a bug into the collector. I would recommend putting it into the collector so that it does not get lost. Please ignore the muted sound of laughter in the background... ;^) -Casey ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
