Wyatt Anderson escribi:
Hello All,
I am trying to use ZPT within a Zope Product I am trying to build.
I want to test the container type I am addding to to determine what
action to take. The following though
from Products.PageTemplates.PageTemplateFile import PageTemplateFile
def
Ian Beatty wrote:
Greetings.
Does anyone know of a good (stable, reliable, fast enough for production
use in a web app) ZODB-equivalent for persisting Java objects?
www.jdocentral.com
Thanks,
..Ian
-- --- -- --- -- --- -- --- -- --- -- --- -- --- -- --- -- --- --
Dr. Ian Beatty
Jim,
let's make this telegraph style :)
OK, here's another.
What about renaming the Zope 3 zope package to z.
+1
- It fits with the expansion of Zope:
Z Object Publishing Environment.
- It's short :)
- *At this time* (but after the move to svn), it's not too hard to make
a change like
+0, not a problem. -1 for renaming 'Zope'.
I endorse the 'src/zope' idea.
Stefan
On Mittwoch, Apr 14, 2004, at 15:00 Europe/Vienna, Jim Fulton wrote:
Perhaps we can get more input on whether there's a problem.
A response with a positive sign (e.g. +1, +0, +2, ...) indicates
agreement that
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:46:27AM +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
| - The packages in z can be used for more than just Zope
|
| +2
So, here's an idea:
- Move component-architecture packages out of 'zope' into 'ca', and
then we don't have the 'zope' vs 'Zope' issue anymore.
I've
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:46:27AM +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
| - The packages in z can be used for more than just Zope
|
| +2
So, here's an idea:
- Move component-architecture packages out of 'zope' into 'ca', and
then we don't have the 'zope' vs 'Zope'
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:59:44AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
| So, what about this:
|
| zope.component
| zope.interfaces (?)
| zope.configuration
| zope.testing
| zope.schema (soon-to-be-dead?)
|
| - All move to 'ca.*'
|
| Most of this has nothing to do with the component architecture.
|
| ca
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:59:44AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
| So, what about this:
|
| zope.component
| zope.interfaces (?)
| zope.configuration
| zope.testing
| zope.schema (soon-to-be-dead?)
|
| - All move to 'ca.*'
|
| Most of this has nothing to do with the component
From: Sidnei da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Move component-architecture packages out of 'zope' into 'ca', and
then we don't have the 'zope' vs 'Zope' issue anymore.
'ca' feels weird. Canada? caca? I don't like it. 'z' is better then. Of
course that means that suddenly the component
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 09:25, Jim Fulton wrote:
From the zope package README.txt:
Zope Project Packages
The zope package is a pure namespace package holding packages developed as
part of the Zope 3 project.
Generally, the immediate subpackages of the zope package should be
Lennart Regebro wrote:
From: Sidnei da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Move component-architecture packages out of 'zope' into 'ca', and
then we don't have the 'zope' vs 'Zope' issue anymore.
'ca' feels weird. Canada? caca? I don't like it. 'z' is better then. Of
course that means that suddenly the
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 09:25, Jim Fulton wrote:
From the zope package README.txt:
Zope Project Packages
The zope package is a pure namespace package holding packages developed as
part of the Zope 3 project.
Generally, the immediate subpackages of the zope package
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 10:23, Jim Fulton wrote:
Each separately distributed package will have a DEPENDENCIES.cfg that is
created by hand and that *constrains* dependencies on other packages. It
makes explicit the intended dependencies. Dependencies not listed here
are bugs. Adding depenencies
This does not work either. With this I get the following traceback:
Traceback (innermost last):
Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 100, in publish
Module ZPublisher.mapply, line 88, in mapply
Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 40, in call_object
Module Products.MyContainer.MyContainer, line
Hi Wyatt,
from Products.PageTemplates.PageTemplateFile import PageTemplateFile
def manage_addMyContainerForm(self, REQUEST):
pt = None
if self.meta_type in ['ContainerType1', 'ContainerType2']:
pt = PageTemplateFile('zpt/addMyContainerForm', globals())
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 11:39, Casey Duncan wrote:
Additionally (and Jim and I have discussed this amongst ourselves) I
feel strongly that the dependancies should be enforced by tests.
Good point.
The dependancy tests might need to be separate from unittests because
they would probably
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 15 April 2004 11:39, Casey Duncan wrote:
Additionally (and Jim and I have discussed this amongst ourselves) I
feel strongly that the dependancies should be enforced by tests. That
is, if you introduce and errant dependancy (by adding an import to a new
package
On Thursday 15 April 2004 13:22, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Note that for checking dependencies in Python code I still think this
tool could be improved by using technology from importchecker.py
http://cvs.zope.org/Zope3/utilities/importchecker.py
which can use Python's compiler module to lift
On Thursday 15 April 2004 10:23 am, Jim Fulton wrote:
(BTW, I think it was a mistake to have top-level persistent and
transaction packages. I think that will eventually come back to haunt us.)
I won't disagree with this. ;-(
The only way to avoid collissions is to pick stupid names
On Thursday 15 April 2004 13:22, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Note that for checking dependencies in Python code I still think this
tool could be improved by using technology from importchecker.py
...
which can use Python's compiler module to lift all imports from source
code, which I think is
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 15 April 2004 13:22, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Note that for checking dependencies in Python code I still think this
tool could be improved by using technology from importchecker.py
http://cvs.zope.org/Zope3/utilities/importchecker.py
which can use Python's
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happens is you write a new serializer, notably write a custom
serializer for an object type you've already been using for a while, using
the default one ? (Presumably because you WANT to be able to access the
contents from other tools)
I
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
although i wonder if there is some hand waving in progress here that i
can't see. i guess my semantic notion of versions has been that of long
lived transactions, and is there a better means of thinking of them? how
do they play across with
23 matches
Mail list logo
