On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 05:18:50PM +0200, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
Am Mittwoch 03 September 2008 16:02:17 schrieb Brian Sutherland:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 02:43:31PM +0200, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
Hi,
In my current SQLAlchemy / Zope-based design, I need the following:
-
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 03 September 2008, David Pratt wrote:
I am trying to avoid the need for selective forking that Chris has found
necessary to make progress with bfg. I want to continue using zope since
these things are a big factor for the factors I stated.
I do not think
Am Donnerstag 04 September 2008 09:10:22 schrieb Brian Sutherland:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 05:18:50PM +0200, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
Am Mittwoch 03 September 2008 16:02:17 schrieb Brian Sutherland:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 02:43:31PM +0200, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
Hi,
In my
Hey,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Stephan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Jim must have read your message with a big smile on his face. He was arguing
for this approach of flat package names about 2-3 years ago and I shot that
proposal down. I hate when I only realize design
Hi there,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benji York wrote:
[snip]
Maybe we should create a new namespace package for browser code.
How about zope.browser?
My general sentiment is against creating more structure than we already
have. Flat
Roger Ineichen wrote:
[snip]
Most packages which are interesting for reuse
provide more or less only ZMI related views.
What about zope.zmi if they provide views for
the ZMI. This views are allmost unuseable
outside the ZMI (know as Rotterdam skin)
Why not simply leave the ZMI stuff in
Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
[snip]
- The real reason I need the interfaces is that I have to include them in my
configure.zcml in order to make the underlying objects read/writeable. But
this is in my case only annoying, but not helpful at all.
Ah, interesting! This is a problem that doesn't
Hi Martijn
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] Dependencies and future of zope 3
Roger Ineichen wrote:
[snip]
Most packages which are interesting for reuse provide more or less
only ZMI related views.
What about zope.zmi if they provide views for the ZMI. This
views are
allmost unuseable
--On 4. September 2008 13:38:27 +0200 Martijn Faassen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
There appears to be a release of zc.recipe.testrunner 1.1.0 which
requires zope.testing 3.6.0, but zope.testing 3.6.0 was not released as
far as I can see. This means zc.recipe.testrunner 1.1.0 cannot
Martijn Faassen wrote:
There appears to be a release of zc.recipe.testrunner 1.1.0 which
requires zope.testing 3.6.0, but zope.testing 3.6.0 was not released as
far as I can see. This means zc.recipe.testrunner 1.1.0 cannot be installed.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.testing/3.6.0
This
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 4. September 2008 13:38:27 +0200 Martijn Faassen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There appears to be a release of zc.recipe.testrunner 1.1.0 which
requires zope.testing 3.6.0, but zope.testing 3.6.0 was not released as
far as I can see. This means zc.recipe.testrunner
Hi there,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
zope.testing 3.6.0 was marked as hidden on PyPI. It's now visible again -
together with 3.5.6.
Does the hidden status explain it not being picked up by buildout?
Anyway, sorry for getting confused there.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the hidden status explain it not being picked up by buildout?
Anyway, sorry for getting confused there.
No; the hidden bit only affects the normal PyPI user interface.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr. fdrake at
Hi there,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I discovered today I think the time is ripe for a blank buffer rewrite
of the testrunner: it is so full of twisty passages that my
confidence in its own internal correctness is seriously depleted. It
has
Hey,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 4, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does the hidden status explain it not being picked up by buildout?
Anyway, sorry for getting
On Sep 4, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 4, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does the hidden status explain it not
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 16:33 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Note also that Christian Theune also started a major
cleanup/reorganization of the testrunner some months ago. Christian
can tell you more about the status and future plans for further
cleanups.
The code became more readable in many
Hello, fellow users and developers of zope components!
I just added support for i18n in z3c.form, so it can be now translated
to many languages. If you want to contribute to z3c.form
internationalization, checkout the z3c.form.pot file from the
z3c.form's trunk and translate it to your language,
18 matches
Mail list logo
