On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:35:09AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Log message for revision 92597:
- Revert to an older zope.testing. New one is way too new
Before:
testing
svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope.testing/tags/3.5.3/src/zope/testing
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Oct 26 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Mon Oct 27 12:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (failures=3, errors=4) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sun Oct 26
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:07 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roché Compaan wrote:
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 09:20 +0200, Hedley Roos wrote:
Have you measures the time needs for some standard ZCatalog queries
used with a Plone site with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:08 , Roché Compaan wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:07 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
- Plone uses too many indexes, and in particular, uses multiple text
indexes. Having extra indexes around just in case is a sure lose
a
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:23 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:08 , Roché Compaan wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:07 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
- Plone uses too many indexes, and in particular, uses multiple text
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:32 , Roché Compaan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:23 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
When it comes to integrating anything in Zope itself I'd choose the
latter.
Sure, we're not trying to get this into Zope, we're just
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:41 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:32 , Roché Compaan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:23 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
When it comes to integrating anything in Zope itself I'd choose the
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27.10.2008 16:28 Uhr, Rudá Porto Filgueiras wrote:
I will sugest a package called zope.memcached (like zope.sqlalchemy
does for SQLAlchemy integration).
That way any application who need to talk memcached can do it
On 27.10.2008 17:18 Uhr, Rudá Porto Filgueiras wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Andreas Jung[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27.10.2008 16:28 Uhr, Rudá Porto Filgueiras wrote:
I will sugest a package called zope.memcached (like zope.sqlalchemy
does for SQLAlchemy integration).
That way
I agree with Tres. A lot more can be done with Indexes and Catalog
without caching.
The most exiciting development in Catalog optimizations comes out
Jarn. Helge Tesdal (iirc) did a buncha work at a RDBMS company when
he was in college. He has a protoype of a query plan for ZCatalog.
On 27.10.2008 18:36 Uhr, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose backporting some of the fixes needed for
Python 2.5 and 2.6 all the way down to Zope 2.10. The fixes that would
be backported would only be those that deal with syntax changes (eg:
'with' and 'as' keyword being used
Hi all,
I would like to propose backporting some of the fixes needed for
Python 2.5 and 2.6 all the way down to Zope 2.10. The fixes that would
be backported would only be those that deal with syntax changes (eg:
'with' and 'as' keyword being used as variables, relative imports) and
some C-level
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we need these backports on the current maintenance branches?
They are small cleanups that could potentially allow someone to run
Python 2.5 or 2.6 if they really really really wanted to, but note
should be made that it
On 27.10.2008 18:55 Uhr, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Andreas Jung[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we need these backports on the current maintenance branches?
They are small cleanups that could potentially allow someone to run
Python 2.5 or 2.6 if they really
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please create branches first and then lets review the changes.
Great.
What is the
state of the compatability of Z3 modules with Python 2.5/2.6 as used in Zope
2.10/2.11?
Hard to tell at this point.
--
Sidnei da Silva
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Subject: FAILED (failures=3, errors=4) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sun Oct 26 22:03:25 EDT 2008
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010375.html
Sidnei,
First, thanks for working to get the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
Is this a typo?
Yes, thanks for the catch.
On Oct 27, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
def f13():
-assert any([True, True, True]) == True
-assert any([True, False, True]) == True
-assert any([False,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
Subject: FAILED (failures=3, errors=4) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sun Oct 26 22:03:25 EDT 2008
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010375.html
Sidnei,
First, thanks for
18 matches
Mail list logo
