On 02/12/2010 08:15, Malthe Borch wrote:
I always found configuration overrides (e.g. ZCML'sincludeOverrides
directive) to be difficult to manage and hard to get right.
How about an alternative where you can put a priority on a
configuration context like so:
adapter zcml:priority=100 ...
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:15:44AM +0100, Malthe Borch wrote:
I always found configuration overrides (e.g. ZCML's includeOverrides
directive) to be difficult to manage and hard to get right.
How about an alternative where you can put a priority on a
configuration context like so:
On 3 December 2010 11:41, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
I'd much prefer it to just be an order of execution thing, the nyou have
total and flexible control. Combined with some logging about why something
is as it is and you have your solution.
It's not always possible to control
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/24/2010 12:19 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
On 11/24/2010 07:58 AM, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Also, can we make the Zope2 tests *not* run the tests for the ZTK, now
that we are using it directly? That would likely make them pass for 2.7.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/2010 07:58 AM, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zope2.13-py2.7 slave-ubuntu32
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Thu Dec 2 13:43:10 EST 2010
URL:
Hello,
I am packaging Zope Toolkit for Ubuntu, but archive admins have
noticed that some files have Zope Public License, Version 2.0 in
their headers. I guess this is unintentional, but now I have to find
such files and specify their license separately. Can I simply change
the version number to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/2010 11:13 AM, Gediminas Paulauskas wrote:
I am packaging Zope Toolkit for Ubuntu, but archive admins have
noticed that some files have Zope Public License, Version 2.0 in
their headers. I guess this is unintentional, but now I have to