Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer nore...@zope.org wrote: [1] UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063362.html Bug in test code, looks like a refactoring went bad. Error in test test_EnsureProtectedDecoCall (AccessControl.tests.testClassSecurityInfo.ClassSecurityInfoTests) Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/python2.6/lib/python2.6/unittest.py, line 279, in run testMethod() File /home/stefan/autotest/temp/python26-zope214all/eggs/AccessControl-3.0-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/AccessControl/tests/testClassSecurityInfo.py, line 131, in test_EnsureProtectedDecoCall with self.assertRaisesRegexp(AssertionError, 'has 2 non-decorator'): AttributeError: 'ClassSecurityInfoTests' object has no attribute 'assertRaisesRegexp' [2] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063350.html [3] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063352.html [4] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063351.html zope.app.twisted does not depend on twisted and does not have it as a dependency. [5] FAILED winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063340.html Same error as last time. Does it make sense to test zope.app.appsetup? ztk does not depend on it it is not part of zopeapp.cfg of ztk 1.1 Grok from 1.3 onward does not use it. Bluebream... Well, bluebream uses zopeapp 1.0, but its last release is also nearly 1.5 years ago. There seems to be a successor(?) named ztfy, which uses ztk 1.1 so is also not dependent on zope.app.appsetup. But I am not sure for how long already. Well, the question is, is there still a need for ztk 1.0 tests? If so, who are the consumers and for how long should we run the tests for 1.0? If anybody replies, please adjust the topic. I guess many people ignore the summarizer thread. [6] FAILED winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063339.html Tres, could it be that this is related to the merge you did? ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] ZTK 1.0 lifetime
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Patrick Gerken do3cc...@googlemail.com wrote: Well, the question is, is there still a need for ztk 1.0 tests? If so, who are the consumers and for how long should we run the tests for 1.0? Zope 2.13 is based on the ZTK 1.0. There's no version of Zope 2 that uses ZTK 1.1 and a potential Zope 4 is aiming at a future ZTK 1.2 (currently ZTK master). So from Zope 2's and Plone's perspective the ZTK 1.0 tests are vital and should be supported for the next couple of years. The only difference is that Zope 2 requires at least Python 2.6, so testing Python 2.5 + ZTK 1.0 isn't required. And this shouldn't be all too hard, as there's no major differences between ZTK 1.0 and 1.1. Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 1.0 lifetime
Eek, I started mixing up ztk and zope.app I didn't look too deep into Zope2 because my intention was more for asking whether packages like zope.app.appsetup need to be tested and they are only part of ztk 1.0 zopeapp.cfg, but now I had second look into versions.cfg of zope and plone and I am seeing that the latest plone still pins versions of ztk 1.0 zopeapp, and zope.app.appsetup even is a dependency somewhere in plone. Aww, too bad. Best regards, Patrick On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote: On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Patrick Gerken do3cc...@googlemail.com wrote: Well, the question is, is there still a need for ztk 1.0 tests? If so, who are the consumers and for how long should we run the tests for 1.0? Zope 2.13 is based on the ZTK 1.0. There's no version of Zope 2 that uses ZTK 1.1 and a potential Zope 4 is aiming at a future ZTK 1.2 (currently ZTK master). So from Zope 2's and Plone's perspective the ZTK 1.0 tests are vital and should be supported for the next couple of years. The only difference is that Zope 2 requires at least Python 2.6, so testing Python 2.5 + ZTK 1.0 isn't required. And this shouldn't be all too hard, as there's no major differences between ZTK 1.0 and 1.1. Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.
On 05/20/2012 04:28 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: I will release a 4.0.1 silencing the warnings unless somebody speaks up in their favor. We should make sure we have 2to3 fixers for everything change as well. I added some fixers, but it's so long ago I'm not sure all changes are covered. But with fixers the warnings aren't very problematic, as fixing the loud failures is just a matter of running the fixers. FWIW, I'm no longer using 2to3 for anything (it was the source of the multi-minute install time for zope.interfaceu under Py3k). I have no objection to having the relevant fixers added to the zope.fixers package. Tres. -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.
On 05/21/2012 04:49 AM, Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: 2012/5/20 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com: On 05/19/2012 07:23 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: They already do: 4.0.0 makes them exceptions under Python3: that fact was actually my rationale for the warnings under Python2, to allow folks to find and remediate them before porting. If they are exceptions under Python 3, developers will get them and have to fix when porting to Python 3. There is a lot of other work to be done at the same time. But under Python 2, implements and friends continue to work, so the warnings are very annoying. I will release a 4.0.1 silencing the warnings unless somebody speaks up in their favor. Please, only warn on Python 3. On Python3, it *needs* to be an exception: code which still uses the class advice APIs won't work. Tres. -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1
On 05/22/2012 04:32 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote: [2]FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063350.html [3]FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063352.html [4]FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063351.html zope.app.twisted does not depend on twisted and does not have it as a dependency. I made a stab at fixing it, but couldn't figure out which version of Twisted was compatible (none of the more recent versions work). I have no idea why tests passed before I copied the release branch. [5]FAILED winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063340.html Same error as last time. Does it make sense to test zope.app.appsetup? ztk does not depend on it it is not part of zopeapp.cfg of ztk 1.1 Grok from 1.3 onward does not use it. Bluebream... Well, bluebream uses zopeapp 1.0, but its last release is also nearly 1.5 years ago. There seems to be a successor(?) named ztfy, which uses ztk 1.1 so is also not dependent on zope.app.appsetup. But I am not sure for how long already. Well, the question is, is there still a need for ztk 1.0 tests? If so, who are the consumers and for how long should we run the tests for 1.0? If anybody replies, please adjust the topic. I guess many people ignore the summarizer thread. I think we can safely stop testing the deprecated pacakgaes individually. [6]FAILED winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063339.html Tres, could it be that this is related to the merge you did? This is a Windows-only failure which I have tried several times to whack. Tres. -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.
On 05/19/2012 05:59 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: On 05/19/2012 12:12 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: I propose that these deprecation warnings be removed. I can do that, if that is the consensus. Now done, and released as zope.interface 4.0.1. Tres. -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: On 05/22/2012 04:32 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote: [2] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063350.html [3] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063352.html [4] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063351.html zope.app.twisted does not depend on twisted and does not have it as a dependency. I made a stab at fixing it, but couldn't figure out which version of Twisted was compatible (none of the more recent versions work). I have no idea why tests passed before I copied the release branch. [5] FAILED winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063340.html Same error as last time. Does it make sense to test zope.app.appsetup? ztk does not depend on it it is not part of zopeapp.cfg of ztk 1.1 Grok from 1.3 onward does not use it. Bluebream... Well, bluebream uses zopeapp 1.0, but its last release is also nearly 1.5 years ago. There seems to be a successor(?) named ztfy, which uses ztk 1.1 so is also not dependent on zope.app.appsetup. But I am not sure for how long already. Well, the question is, is there still a need for ztk 1.0 tests? If so, who are the consumers and for how long should we run the tests for 1.0? If anybody replies, please adjust the topic. I guess many people ignore the summarizer thread. I think we can safely stop testing the deprecated pacakgaes individually. Unfortunately somehow Plone still depends on it. [6] FAILED winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063339.html Tres, could it be that this is related to the merge you did? This is a Windows-only failure which I have tried several times to whack. I THINK I fixed it. The commit message explains the failure if anybody wants to know. http://zope3.pov.lt/trac/changeset/126448 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 2, OK: 41, UNKNOWN: 1
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-05-21 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-22 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux [1]FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [2]winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32 [3]winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 Non-OK results -- [1]UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063405.html [2]FAILED winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063383.html [3]FAILED winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063382.html ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
