At 08:04 PM 12/12/00 -0500, BS wrote:
>Do DataSkins have ownership? I want to give multiple users the ability to
>add objects to a rack and only allow the 'owner' to view/edit the object.
>When a user adds a DataSkin to a rack does he get ownership of the object?
>I can't seem to get the ownership
Do DataSkins have ownership? I want to give multiple users the ability to
add objects to a rack and only allow the 'owner' to view/edit the object.
When a user adds a DataSkin to a rack does he get ownership of the object?
I can't seem to get the ownership information for these objects. Is there a
At 07:23 PM 12/12/00 +0100, Ulrich Eck wrote:
>
>I can deal arround that if i reget the DSO from the specialist in every
>function which deals with DSO's.
This is the correct way to do it if you are using Specialists rather than
Folder w/Customization Support.
>
>is there a better way to
>
>a) t
Hi Folks,
I've modified Toby Dickenson's patch to let Zope work with Python 2 so
that it patches against Zope 2.2.4.
http://www.zope.org/Members/stevea/unicode_for_224.patch.gz
Toby's page about using unicode and Python 2 with Zope is here:
http://www.zope.org/Members/htrd/wstring
--
Ste
hi out there,
i use zpatterns/specialists for a Network-Documentation Tool.
I'm writing a Product which controls the relations between specialists
and manages multible actions (edit/new/delete) for ZPatterns DataSkinObjects
(DSO).
I have a Product-Instance of ZTWM (ZTransactionWorkflowManager)
If I have ignore_empty set in a variable name of type date, field2date()
fails if the returned value is truly empty.
I think field2date() should return None rather than trying to call DateTime
with an empty string.
I keep making this patch to each Zope release, but would like to talk
about a
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 03:16:51PM -0500, Brad Clements wrote:
> I have found a bug in ZSQL methods that is describe by this collector
> item:
>
> http://classic.zope.org:8080/Collector/718/view
>
> This item was posted over a year ago! The bug is still in the program, so
> I'm guessing that D
Itai,
I think this is a brilliant idea! I'm sure there are sixteen
ways to implement each of these... but having one concrete way would
be a big help to a novice
-steve
>
>
>Object relationship|
> (Pattern) | Implementation
>
>--
Since Ty Sarna pointed out that there is another thingy out there labeled as
Zircon, I have changed the products name to the original project ID, IRCGate.
Yes, I know, I should have checked. (oops, I did it again ;) )
Thank you, Ty Sarna, and my apologies to anyone who already got zIRCon.
--