Re: [Zope-dev] un-own an object

2001-04-13 Thread Chris Withers
"R. David Murray" wrote: Like I said (and the docs say), it is the interesection of the two sets of privileges, so it is effectively just the permissions of user nobody. This isn't very useful though ;-) I ended up re-creating a whole folder tree just because I wanted to delete the user

Re: [Zope-dev] getattr'ing proxy object's methods

2001-04-13 Thread Dieter Maurer
Kent Polk writes: I do not understand your goal precisely... However, the surrogate technique used in "CMFCore.DirectoryView.DirectoryView" may come near to your proxie objects. Dieter ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Zope-dev] un-own an object

2001-04-13 Thread Tim McLaughlin
I meant create an instance of a ZClass owned by a user who no longer exists (if my 'construct' word made no sense - haven't had coffee yet ;-) ). -Original Message- From: Tim McLaughlin Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 7:31 AM To: 'Chris Withers'; R. David Murray Cc: Tim McLaughlin; '[EMAIL

[Zope-dev] REQUIRING Python 2.1??

2001-04-13 Thread anser
[ First of all, I wish people (including Digicoolers) would title their messages descriptively, not just say "Important notice" or whatever. I'm sure many of us consider our words important :) ] Second, I am MYSTIFIED (there's no better word) that DC is in such a rush to REQUIRE the use of

[Zope-dev] Re: zope nautilus cabal

2001-04-13 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
this is true. i tried to acces zope on my local machine at the address http://localhost:9673/ (note: *without* the manage!) and nautilus showed me everything. both mozilla and netscape show the welcome page. if i add manage nautilus simply refuse to authenticate. my impression is that

[Zope-dev] RE: [Zope] REQUIRING Python 2.1??

2001-04-13 Thread Brian Lloyd
Second, I am MYSTIFIED (there's no better word) that DC is in such a rush to REQUIRE the use of Python 2.1 for Zope 2.4, when we're still waiting for Py 2.1 final to even come out. Why put all your eggs in that basket, and why force the community to choose between changing to a bleeding-edge

[Zope-dev] RE: [Zope] REQUIRING Python 2.1??

2001-04-13 Thread anser
You may have more than one Python installation on a machine. This in no way forces you to move "all of your applications" to 2.1. The binary releases in particular make this drop-dead easy; they come with a bundled Python, and do not affect any other Python you may have in any way. right,

Re: [Zope-dev] RE: [Zope] REQUIRING Python 2.1??

2001-04-13 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:10:52PM -0400, anser wrote: You may have more than one Python installation on a machine. This in no way forces you to move "all of your applications" to 2.1. The binary releases in particular make this drop-dead easy; they come with a bundled Python, and do not

[Zope-dev] Re: zope nautilus cabal

2001-04-13 Thread Andrea Fanfani
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:01:13PM +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: http://localhost:9673/ \ There is another method From the zope-it ml andrea@mowgli:~$ cadaver http://foo.bar:9673 Looking up hostname... Connecting to server... connected. Connecting to server... connected. dav:/

[Zope-dev] RE: [Zope] REQUIRING Python 2.1??

2001-04-13 Thread Albert Langer
[anser] I can't quite help wondering whether someone at DC has maybe gotten so "into" the development of Py 2.1 that they just can't wait to use its new stuff, whether it's objectively what's best for Zope or not. The prudent thing to do would have been to add features as needed using

[Zope-dev] RE: [Zope] REQUIRING Python 2.1??

2001-04-13 Thread Tom Neff
If what Albert says is true, then Zope 2.4 should REQUIRE Py 2.0 and SUPPORT Py 2.1, not REQUIRE Py 2.1. --On Saturday, April 14, 2001 1:14 AM +1000 Albert Langer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The *big* leap is from 1.5.2 to 2.0 which has been out for quite a while. I18N is *desperately* needed

Re: [Zope-dev] REQUIRING Python 2.1??

2001-04-13 Thread Andy McKay
On the basis of prior performance I do not expect this objection to make any difference in what DC does, but I needed to express it anyway. Hey give DC a break! I think people keep forgetting this is a free open source product and they have strived to do everything they can to improve Zope,

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] **Important Notice** for Zope public CVS users

2001-04-13 Thread ender
On Friday 13 April 2001 02:22, Oleg Broytmann wrote: Hi! On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Brian Lloyd wrote: We are soon going to begin checking in changes to the head of the Zope CVS that will require the use of Python 2.1. Once we start on the 2.4 tasks, you will not be able to use a public CVS

Re: [Zope-dev] getattr'ing proxy object's methods

2001-04-13 Thread Kent Polk
On 13 Apr 2001 05:50:01 -0500, Dieter Maurer wrote: Kent Polk writes: I do not understand your goal precisely... However, the surrogate technique used in "CMFCore.DirectoryView.DirectoryView" may come near to your proxie objects. I played around with that and can't quite see how to map

[Zope-dev] Re: RackImage

2001-04-13 Thread Michael R. Bernstein
Itai Tavor wrote: Thanks, Michael! Turns out I just had to make a few small changes in my product to get it to work, which I discovered looking at yours. Don't know if anything in my product that it would be interesting to add to yours... it's aimed at storing photos for a product

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: zope nautilus cabal

2001-04-13 Thread Chris McDonough
How is this any different than visiting the site in a web browser? - Original Message - From: "Andrea Fanfani" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Federico Di Gregorio" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 12:21 PM Subject:

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: zope nautilus cabal

2001-04-13 Thread Andrea Fanfani
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:49:24PM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: How is this any different than visiting the site in a web browser? [...] The difference is that in this way you can see the internal structure of the data.fs and not only the http output from zope. You can access to the /manage

[Zope-dev] RE: [Zope] REQUIRING Python 2.1??

2001-04-13 Thread Steven D. Majewski
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Tom Neff wrote: If what Albert says is true, then Zope 2.4 should REQUIRE Py 2.0 and SUPPORT Py 2.1, not REQUIRE Py 2.1. But note what he said about "odd numbered releases". True to form, 2.0 adds a whole load of features, and 2.1 cleans up after 2.0. ;-) True,

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: zope nautilus cabal

2001-04-13 Thread Chris McDonough
This isn't a bug, it's a feature. A bad one, likely, as there's no easy way to turn it off. ;-) I believe that if you turn off "Access Contents Information" permission for anonymous on the root folder, a WebDAV directory listing can't be retrieved. This, however, likely breaks lots of things

[Zope-dev] Query on ZODB handling of class variables

2001-04-13 Thread Bob Weiner
Hi all: I'm doing some prototyping using the standalone version of ZODB from AMK (March 30, 2001 release, the latest). Things generally work as AMK has documented them but one issue has cropped up on which I could use your feedback. My reading of the ZODB code is that it uses pickling to

Re: [Zope-dev] un-own an object

2001-04-13 Thread Chris Withers
I meant create an instance of a ZClass owned by a user who no longer exists (if my 'construct' word made no sense - haven't had coffee yet ;-) ). Well, the other option is that you can create a user with the same name and the manager role... cheers, Chris

[Zope-dev] Re:2.3.3?

2001-04-13 Thread Chris Withers
The next stable release may very well (very probably) be a 2.3.3 release. Which will still be a Python 1.5.2 release. I have the idea that you think that either the 2.3.x line will switch to Python 2.1 now (and 2.3.3 is to be released soon) or that no more development on the 2.3.x line will

Re: [Zope-dev] general ZMySQL question-wierd results

2001-04-13 Thread Andy Dustman
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is how I created the tables: CREATE TABLE farm ( owner_id int primary key not null auto_increment, farm_name char (40), discipline char (30), owner_fname char(30), owner_lname char(30), farm_address1 char(50),

Re: [Zope-dev] memory leak

2001-04-13 Thread Karl Anderson
Marco Nova [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've replaced ParsedXML's ExpatBuilder with the pyXML package and I used the sax parser without modifing the code (except for the import), this is the refcounts results. Class April 12, 2001 11:55 am April 12, 2001 12:00 xml.dom.NodeList.NodeList