"R. David Murray" wrote:
Like I said (and the docs say), it is the interesection of the two
sets of privileges, so it is effectively just the permissions of
user nobody.
This isn't very useful though ;-)
I ended up re-creating a whole folder tree just because I wanted to delete the
user
Kent Polk writes:
I do not understand your goal precisely...
However, the surrogate technique used in
"CMFCore.DirectoryView.DirectoryView" may come near
to your proxie objects.
Dieter
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I meant create an instance of a ZClass owned by a user who no longer exists
(if my 'construct' word made no sense - haven't had coffee yet ;-) ).
-Original Message-
From: Tim McLaughlin
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 7:31 AM
To: 'Chris Withers'; R. David Murray
Cc: Tim McLaughlin; '[EMAIL
[ First of all, I wish people (including Digicoolers) would title their
messages descriptively, not just say "Important notice" or whatever. I'm
sure many of us consider our words important :) ]
Second, I am MYSTIFIED (there's no better word) that DC is in such a rush
to REQUIRE the use of
this is true. i tried to acces zope on my local machine at the address
http://localhost:9673/
(note: *without* the manage!) and nautilus showed me everything. both
mozilla and netscape show the welcome page. if i add manage nautilus
simply refuse to authenticate. my impression is that
Second, I am MYSTIFIED (there's no better word) that DC is in such a rush
to REQUIRE the use of Python 2.1 for Zope 2.4, when we're still
waiting for
Py 2.1 final to even come out. Why put all your eggs in that basket, and
why force the community to choose between changing to a bleeding-edge
You may have more than one Python installation on a machine. This in no
way forces you to move "all of your applications" to 2.1. The binary
releases in particular make this drop-dead easy; they come with a bundled
Python, and do not affect any other Python you may have in any way.
right,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:10:52PM -0400, anser wrote:
You may have more than one Python installation on a machine. This in no
way forces you to move "all of your applications" to 2.1. The binary
releases in particular make this drop-dead easy; they come with a bundled
Python, and do not
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:01:13PM +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
http://localhost:9673/
\
There is another method
From the zope-it ml
andrea@mowgli:~$ cadaver http://foo.bar:9673
Looking up hostname...
Connecting to server... connected.
Connecting to server... connected.
dav:/
[anser]
I can't quite help wondering whether someone at DC has maybe gotten so
"into" the development of Py 2.1 that they just can't wait to use its new
stuff, whether it's objectively what's best for Zope or not. The prudent
thing to do would have been to add features as needed using
If what Albert says is true, then Zope 2.4 should REQUIRE Py 2.0 and
SUPPORT Py 2.1, not REQUIRE Py 2.1.
--On Saturday, April 14, 2001 1:14 AM +1000 Albert Langer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The *big* leap is from 1.5.2 to 2.0 which has been out for quite a while.
I18N is *desperately* needed
On the basis of prior performance I do not expect this objection to make
any difference in what DC does, but I needed to express it anyway.
Hey give DC a break! I think people keep forgetting this is a free open
source product and they have strived to do everything they can to improve
Zope,
On Friday 13 April 2001 02:22, Oleg Broytmann wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Brian Lloyd wrote:
We are soon going to begin checking in changes to the head of
the Zope CVS that will require the use of Python 2.1. Once we
start on the 2.4 tasks, you will not be able to use a public
CVS
On 13 Apr 2001 05:50:01 -0500, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Kent Polk writes:
I do not understand your goal precisely...
However, the surrogate technique used in
"CMFCore.DirectoryView.DirectoryView" may come near
to your proxie objects.
I played around with that and can't quite see how to map
Itai Tavor wrote:
Thanks, Michael! Turns out I just had to make a few small changes in
my product to get it to work, which I discovered looking at yours.
Don't know if anything in my product that it would be interesting to
add to yours... it's aimed at storing photos for a product
How is this any different than visiting the site in a web browser?
- Original Message -
From: "Andrea Fanfani" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Federico Di Gregorio" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 12:21 PM
Subject:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:49:24PM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
How is this any different than visiting the site in a web browser?
[...]
The difference is that in this way you can see the internal structure
of the data.fs and not only the http output from zope.
You can access to the /manage
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Tom Neff wrote:
If what Albert says is true, then Zope 2.4 should REQUIRE Py 2.0 and
SUPPORT Py 2.1, not REQUIRE Py 2.1.
But note what he said about "odd numbered releases".
True to form, 2.0 adds a whole load of features, and 2.1 cleans up
after 2.0. ;-)
True,
This isn't a bug, it's a feature. A bad one, likely, as there's no easy way
to turn it off. ;-) I believe that if you turn off "Access Contents
Information" permission for anonymous on the root folder, a WebDAV directory
listing can't be retrieved. This, however, likely breaks lots of things
Hi all:
I'm doing some prototyping using the standalone version of ZODB from AMK (March 30,
2001 release, the latest). Things generally work as AMK has documented
them but one issue has cropped up on which I could use your feedback. My reading of
the ZODB code is that it uses pickling to
I meant create an instance of a ZClass owned by a user who no longer
exists
(if my 'construct' word made no sense - haven't had coffee yet ;-) ).
Well, the other option is that you can create a user with the same name and
the manager role...
cheers,
Chris
The next stable release may very well (very probably) be a 2.3.3 release.
Which will still be a Python 1.5.2 release. I have the idea that you think
that either the 2.3.x line will switch to Python 2.1 now (and 2.3.3 is to
be
released soon) or that no more development on the 2.3.x line will
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is how I created the tables:
CREATE TABLE farm (
owner_id int primary key not null auto_increment,
farm_name char (40),
discipline char (30),
owner_fname char(30),
owner_lname char(30),
farm_address1 char(50),
Marco Nova [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've replaced ParsedXML's ExpatBuilder with the pyXML package and I used the
sax parser without modifing the code (except for the import), this is the
refcounts results.
Class April 12, 2001 11:55 am April 12, 2001 12:00
xml.dom.NodeList.NodeList
24 matches
Mail list logo
