Hi Dyon,
--On Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2001 05:07 +1000 Dyon Balding
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tino,
Thanks for your reply.
When you say it works fine on a dual processor machine, are you saying
that a single ZEO client fully utilises both processors? or that you
are running two ZEO clients
Phil Harris wrote:
Try search for extensionbuilder.py, this is the magic.
If you can't find it let me know and I'll send it to you.
Be warned though that there are some things it doesn't cope with, the new
btree stuff springs to mind.
We've completely failed to build anything using
What we experience with CoreSessionTracking:
We have a manage mode in the Kontentor CMS hacky thing (no, it is NOT a
product yet ;-)). It works well for some time (i.e. if I click on it, the
system switches to manage mode and stays in manage mode until I click
again), but from time to time it is
These it appears CST is unstable reports are helpful to an extent
(from Bjorn, Joachim, and Howard), as it lets me know that something
needs to be done to CST. However, a much more helpful report would be
one which provides a repeatable test case which invariably reproduces
the problem instead
Great to see you've got it working!
-Original Message-
From:Magnus Heino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Wed, 23 May 2001 22:44:22 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fwd: ZClassEvents
---
Magnus,
Did you get this working?
Yes. Sorry that you didnt get any
I'm starting to check out how SearchIndex works, and I've run into the
following question: how does one iterate through *TreeItems objects? I
thought this was trivial, but I'm doing the following:
t = BTrees.IOBTree.IOBTree()
t.insert(1,'Foo')
1
t.items()
IOBTreeItems object at 0x82551b0
t
Erik Enge wrote:
Hi,
is it me, or is this just not working:
(word1 or word*) and (wor?3)
ie. wildcards in TextIndex queries. I can't seem to make it work, and I'm
not able to track down where it stops working. Should it work in the
first place?
Zope 2.3.2
Thanks.
I've just fixed the imports so people using SearchIndex out of Zope have
success importing it. Andrew's setup.py can be used if you remove the
parts from it that refer to query (it's attached so people can use it if
they like). I'm using CVS SearchIndex (from the Zope2 branch) but there's
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Casey Duncan wrote:
Works great for me. Perhaps you are using a Vocabulary that has
Globbing turned off?
I'm not sure, how do I check?
This query works:
wil?car*
This doesn't:
(wil?car* or something else) and (word1 and word2)
I can't see that the
Erik Enge wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Casey Duncan wrote:
Works great for me. Perhaps you are using a Vocabulary that has
Globbing turned off?
I'm not sure, how do I check?
This query works:
wil?car*
This doesn't:
(wil?car* or something else) and (word1 and
My Xron file has gone crazy and does not stop running. I have stopped my
server and started it again, but the xron file is still running. This
causes the Z2.log file and Data.fs files to
grow to enormous files and I struggle to be able to log into the system.
First: Can I delete the overloaded
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
This query works:
wil?car*
This doesn't:
(wil?car* or something else) and (word1 and word2)
If the first works, then you are using a globbing vocabulary. The second
one should work, but maybe there is a bug. Or perhaps your search
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
Good, then it's just not me. Is the overall design philosophy for
ZCatalog/Catalog/SearchIndex documented anywhere? (By the way, from
lib/python/SearchIndex/TextIndex.py, what is sws and cv3?)
I'm trying to get a knot of knowledge into my head by
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Michel Pelletier wrote:
If the first works, then you are using a globbing vocabulary. The
second one should work, but maybe there is a bug. Or perhaps your
search criteria is so strict that you are getting no results.
Hm.
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
These it appears CST is unstable reports are helpful to an extent
(from Bjorn, Joachim, and Howard), as it lets me know that something
needs to be done to CST. However, a much more helpful report would be
one which provides a repeatable test case
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
Hi, I've been testing SearchIndex's Splitter here, and I'm finding the
behaviour only a tiny bit strange: it converts the words it splits to
lowercase. Is this intentional?
Yes.
Example:
import SearchIndex.Splitter
import
1. If you can use the management interface, you can disable a Xron Scheduled
Method by deleting it from the Schedule catalog or setting its reschedule
interval to null.
2. If you delete (or just rename __init__.py to something else in) the Xron
Product. And restart Zope, there will be no
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Loren Stafford wrote:
5. You can truncate the bloated tail end of a Data.fs file using standard
system tools. I don't remember how right at the moment, but a search in the
mail archives on trucate and data.fs might be fruitful.
Use the unix command 'split'. I immagine
Does DC plan to have site developer make their own management interface?
The site-developer wouln't mind using the management interface for their
work, but most of them will reject the common users using it. Of cause
there were security issues also.
Allow the site developer to make new
However, a much more helpful report would be
one which provides a repeatable test case which invariably reproduces
the problem instead of one which states the symptoms and effects of the
problem.
I know, but that's why the errors are called random: They are not easy to
replicate ...
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Michel Pelletier wrote:
This is a very common indexing strategy to save space and make searches
more relevant. Otherwise 'Dog' and 'dog' would return two completely
different result sets.
Fine. However:
s.indexes('Foo')
[]
Is _this_ supposed to happen, too? Ah, I
Does DC plan to have site developer make their own management interface?
The site-developer wouln't mind using the management interface for their
work, but most of them will reject the common users using it. Of cause
there were security issues also.
Allow the site developer to make new
- Original Message -
From: Christian Robottom Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fascinating points on i18n and l10n of the indexing mechanism. Makes me
wonder how far the current implementation will go before having to be
rewritten, and if the world will survive east-meets-the-west of computing
Joachim Werner wrote:
However, a much more helpful report would be
one which provides a repeatable test case which invariably reproduces
the problem instead of one which states the symptoms and effects of the
problem.
I know, but that's why the errors are called random: They are not
Chris McDonough wrote:
I just wrote a test case that emulates many visitors firing off sessions
and making changes to shared data objects simultaneously. It even
emulates aborted connections. Unfortunately, I see nothing out of the
ordinary. :-( This is very frustrating.
Maybe the
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Michel Pelletier wrote:
This is a very common indexing strategy to save space and make searches
more relevant. Otherwise 'Dog' and 'dog' would return two completely
different result sets.
Fine. However:
26 matches
Mail list logo
