[cc'ed to zope-dev so people can check this information]
On Thursday 04 October 2001 13:47, Joseph Wayne Norton wrote:
> One related question that I have regarding cgi.py and zope.
>
> Would there be any compatibility problem of applying the following
> older cgi hotfix to python's cgi.py file an
Johan -
I have done a similiar hotfix by using None - which I think is a
better alternative than ''.
If you want to see all of the source, download the following Product,
http://www.zope.org/Members/natsukashi/Products/CMFPropertyCore, and
look inside the file CMFPropertyCore/LinkPropertyManage
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 22:00, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, John Ziniti wrote:
> > Yeah ... something tells me it's a little more complicated than that.
>
> Like recompiling the kernel, quite possibly. On FreeBSD there's
> a sysctl, although you may still have to recompile th
> Would it be smart to include the python header files in the zope binary
> distributions? That would seem to solve a few problems for the
> individuals using them.
We'll be doing this as of Zope 2.4.2 (early next week, I hope).
Brian Lloyd[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Engineer 540.361.
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 12:54 am, Shane Rowatt allegedly wrote:
> Zope Version: 2.4.1 on linux.
>
> When I tried to add a ZCatalog followed by finding objects to index using
> the default indices provided (path, summary, id, title etc), the 'path' and
> 'summary' indices are never generated.
On Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at 10:53 AM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
wrote:
>
>
> Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
>
>> The next binary release will go out the door with Python headers
>> installed. We've already set it up for the packager to do that.
>
>
> Does that mean that using the binary Zope
Hi,
We currently want to use date-properties in the regular property sheet.
The current date-property doesn't accept an empty value.
We want to be able to submit an empty string and set a NullDate value
indicating. Also a NullDate value should return an empty string when the
"manage_propertiesForm
well, the actual extension does not matter. you could as well specify
something like "--with-suffix=.mary_had_a_little_lamb" if you wanted...
for a more technological explanation, when the compile is done the
executable is copied into the root of the python source tree. by default
the name of
Mitchell L Model wrote:
> [...] With the updates for OS 10.1 in Python 2.2a4, all I had to do
> to make both Python and Zope was:
>
> cd Python2.2a4
> configure --with-suffix=.exe
> make
> sudo make install
>
> cd Zope
> python wo_pcgi.py
I don't know if it's ju
Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
> The next binary release will go out the door with Python headers
> installed. We've already set it up for the packager to do that.
Does that mean that using the binary Zope bundled python to call
setup.py or using the binary Zope bundled Makefile.pre.in will cor
Jim Washington wrote:
>
> Would it be smart to include the python header files in the zope
> binary distributions? That would seem to solve a few problems for the
> individuals using them.
>
> -- Jim Washington
>
The next binary release will go out the door with Python headers
installed. We
Would it be smart to include the python header files in the zope binary
distributions? That would seem to solve a few problems for the
individuals using them.
-- Jim Washington
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Zope] Python 2.1 for debian ?
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 12:51:37 +000
- Original Message -
From: "Shane Rowatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 00:54
Subject: [Zope-dev] ZCatalog: path & summary indices not generated
>
> Unfortunately I tried the same with the 'path' index by adding the
following
> to DTMLMethod
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, John Ziniti wrote:
> Yeah ... something tells me it's a little more complicated than that.
Like recompiling the kernel, quite possibly. On FreeBSD there's
a sysctl, although you may still have to recompile the kernel in
some cases I think; on Linux you can zap a variable in p
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Toby Dickenson wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 20:53:00 +0200, Jerome Alet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >It may prove to be useful when you want to do remote logging: you
> >send all to the local syslog which in fact forwards it to a remote
> >syslog server.
>
> I understand
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 20:53:00 +0200, Jerome Alet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 04:14:47PM +0100, Toby Dickenson wrote:
>>
>> A question for all syslog users; is it ever useful to send access logs to
>> syslog? (I can't think of good reason, but my syslog zen quotient is still
16 matches
Mail list logo
