Re: [Zope-dev] syslog

2001-10-03 Thread Toby Dickenson
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 20:53:00 +0200, Jerome Alet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 04:14:47PM +0100, Toby Dickenson wrote: A question for all syslog users; is it ever useful to send access logs to syslog? (I can't think of good reason, but my syslog zen quotient is still low).

Re: [Zope-dev] syslog

2001-10-03 Thread Jerome Alet
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Toby Dickenson wrote: On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 20:53:00 +0200, Jerome Alet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It may prove to be useful when you want to do remote logging: you send all to the local syslog which in fact forwards it to a remote syslog server. I understand the

Re: [Zope-dev] file descriptors on Solaris

2001-10-03 Thread R. David Murray
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, John Ziniti wrote: Yeah ... something tells me it's a little more complicated than that. Like recompiling the kernel, quite possibly. On FreeBSD there's a sysctl, although you may still have to recompile the kernel in some cases I think; on Linux you can zap a variable in

Re: [Zope-dev] ZCatalog: path summary indices not generated

2001-10-03 Thread Andreas Jung
- Original Message - From: Shane Rowatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 00:54 Subject: [Zope-dev] ZCatalog: path summary indices not generated Unfortunately I tried the same with the 'path' index by adding the following to DTMLMethod.py

[Zope-dev] [Fwd: Re: [Zope] Python 2.1 for debian ?]

2001-10-03 Thread Jim Washington
Would it be smart to include the python header files in the zope binary distributions? That would seem to solve a few problems for the individuals using them. -- Jim Washington Original Message Subject: Re: [Zope] Python 2.1 for debian ? Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 12:51:37

Re: [Zope-dev] [Fwd: Re: [Zope] Python 2.1 for debian ?]

2001-10-03 Thread Matthew T. Kromer
Jim Washington wrote: Would it be smart to include the python header files in the zope binary distributions? That would seem to solve a few problems for the individuals using them. -- Jim Washington The next binary release will go out the door with Python headers installed. We've

Re: [Zope-dev] [Fwd: Re: [Zope] Python 2.1 for debian ?]

2001-10-03 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
Matthew T. Kromer wrote: The next binary release will go out the door with Python headers installed. We've already set it up for the packager to do that. Does that mean that using the binary Zope bundled python to call setup.py or using the binary Zope bundled Makefile.pre.in will

Re: [Zope-dev] compiling Zope 2.4.1 on Mac OS 10.1

2001-10-03 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
Mitchell L Model wrote: [...] With the updates for OS 10.1 in Python 2.2a4, all I had to do to make both Python and Zope was: cd Python2.2a4 configure --with-suffix=.exe make sudo make install cd Zope python wo_pcgi.py I don't know if it's just me,

Re: [Zope-dev] compiling Zope 2.4.1 on Mac OS 10.1

2001-10-03 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
well, the actual extension does not matter. you could as well specify something like --with-suffix=.mary_had_a_little_lamb if you wanted... for a more technological explanation, when the compile is done the executable is copied into the root of the python source tree. by default the name of

[Zope-dev] RFC: Date property requiers valid date (no more)

2001-10-03 Thread Johan Carlsson
Hi, We currently want to use date-properties in the regular property sheet. The current date-property doesn't accept an empty value. We want to be able to submit an empty string and set a NullDate value indicating. Also a NullDate value should return an empty string when the manage_propertiesForm

Re: [Zope-dev] [Fwd: Re: [Zope] Python 2.1 for debian ?]

2001-10-03 Thread Matthew T. Kromer
On Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at 10:53 AM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: Matthew T. Kromer wrote: The next binary release will go out the door with Python headers installed. We've already set it up for the packager to do that. Does that mean that using the binary Zope bundled

Re: [Zope-dev] ZCatalog: path summary indices not generated

2001-10-03 Thread Casey Duncan
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 12:54 am, Shane Rowatt allegedly wrote: Zope Version: 2.4.1 on linux. When I tried to add a ZCatalog followed by finding objects to index using the default indices provided (path, summary, id, title etc), the 'path' and 'summary' indices are never generated. The

RE: [Zope-dev] [Fwd: Re: [Zope] Python 2.1 for debian ?]

2001-10-03 Thread Brian Lloyd
Would it be smart to include the python header files in the zope binary distributions? That would seem to solve a few problems for the individuals using them. We'll be doing this as of Zope 2.4.2 (early next week, I hope). Brian Lloyd[EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Engineer

Re: [Zope-dev] file descriptors on Solaris - IT'S A BUG, PEOPLE!

2001-10-03 Thread Richard Jones
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 22:00, R. David Murray wrote: On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, John Ziniti wrote: Yeah ... something tells me it's a little more complicated than that. Like recompiling the kernel, quite possibly. On FreeBSD there's a sysctl, although you may still have to recompile the

Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: Date property requiers valid date (no more)

2001-10-03 Thread Joseph Wayne Norton
Johan - I have done a similiar hotfix by using None - which I think is a better alternative than ''. If you want to see all of the source, download the following Product, http://www.zope.org/Members/natsukashi/Products/CMFPropertyCore, and look inside the file

Re: [Zope-dev] file descriptors on Solaris - IT'S A BUG, PEOPLE!

2001-10-03 Thread Richard Jones
[cc'ed to zope-dev so people can check this information] On Thursday 04 October 2001 13:47, Joseph Wayne Norton wrote: One related question that I have regarding cgi.py and zope. Would there be any compatibility problem of applying the following older cgi hotfix to python's cgi.py file and