Re: [Zope-dev] still segfaults, this time no ZMySQLDA

2002-02-28 Thread Matthew T. Kromer
On Wednesday, February 27, 2002, at 06:49 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: So, what should I try now? Did -t 1 help? If not, do you feel comfortable hooking up gdb and getting a traceback? ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-02-28 Thread Brian Lloyd
Hi all - Paul sent a note to zope-coders some time back fishing for some feedback regarding planning for a Zope 2.6 (excepted): I propose that planning for a 2.6 focus on the following thoughts: 1) This release is more about community-contributed work than ZC-contributed work. ...

Re: [Zope-dev] FieldIndex unindex_object could not remove... This should not happen.

2002-02-28 Thread Andreas Jung
what zope version ? - aj - Original Message - From: Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: local.lists.zope.zope-dev To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 13:45 Subject: [Zope-dev] FieldIndex unindex_object could not remove... This should not happen. Playing

Re: [Zope-dev] still segfaults, this time no ZMySQLDA

2002-02-28 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 10:55, Matthew T. Kromer wrote: On Wednesday, February 27, 2002, at 06:49 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: So, what should I try now? Did -t 1 help? If not, do you feel comfortable hooking up gdb and getting a traceback? Funny enough, running with -t 1

Re: [Zope-dev] still segfaults, this time no ZMySQLDA

2002-02-28 Thread Matthew T. Kromer
On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 02:09 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: Funny enough, running with -t 1 solved it. /me starts looking sideways to ZMySQLDA again, since it's not the new beta version... Good! Based on the fact that I'm not being innundated with I'm still crashing!

Re: [Zope-dev] still segfaults, this time no ZMySQLDA

2002-02-28 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 16:09, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 10:55, Matthew T. Kromer wrote: On Wednesday, February 27, 2002, at 06:49 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: So, what should I try now? Did -t 1 help? If not, do you feel comfortable

Re: [Zope-dev] FieldIndex unindex_object could not remove... This should not happen.

2002-02-28 Thread Florent Guillaume
2.5.0 linux binary release, sorry. Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what zope version ? - aj - Original Message - From: Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: local.lists.zope.zope-dev To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 13:45 Subject:

Re: [Zope-dev] FieldIndex unindex_object could not remove... This should not happen.

2002-02-28 Thread Florent Guillaume
Ok forget about it, I was unindexing and indexing from several catalogs, and mixed some of them up. All is well now. (However the message was still strange...) Florent Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2.5.0 linux binary release, sorry. Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [Zope-dev] FieldIndex unindex_object could not remove... This should not happen.

2002-02-28 Thread Andreas Jung
Well...that should not happen :-) Maybe try the check_catalog.py script from Zope 2.5.X to find any problems in the indexes. Andreas - Original Message - From: Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: local.lists.zope.zope-dev To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28,

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-02-28 Thread Behrens Matt - Grand Rapids
Brian Lloyd wrote: Let's get a discussion started to define 2.6. This isn't exciting by any means unless you're one of the people who package Zope up for distribution, or maybe you're one of the people who manage lots of little Zopes on one system; but I'd like to revive the grand unified

Re: [Zope-dev] FieldIndex unindex_object could not remove... This should not happen.

2002-02-28 Thread Florent Guillaume
Both catalogs were ok. BTW this patch is needed: --- check_catalog.pyThu Feb 28 22:13:30 2002 +++ check_catalog.pyThu Feb 28 22:23:15 2002 @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ if o in ['--FieldIndex','--KeywordIndex','--PathIndex']: indexes.append(o[2:]) -

Re: [Zope-Coders] Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-02-28 Thread Casey Duncan
On Thursday 28 February 2002 04:03 pm, you wrote: Brian Lloyd wrote: Let's get a discussion started to define 2.6. This isn't exciting by any means unless you're one of the people who package Zope up for distribution, or maybe you're one of the people who manage lots of little Zopes

Re: [Zope-dev] still segfaults, this time no ZMySQLDA

2002-02-28 Thread Casey Duncan
On Thursday 28 February 2002 02:51 pm, Leonardo Rochael Almeida allegedly wrote: [snip] When you see the result page, you know that your pythonScripts are recompiled (of course it won't take that long unless you have an 800+MiB Data.fs crammed full of python scripts :-) Cheers, Leo I hope

[Zope-dev] improved logging

2002-02-28 Thread Romain Slootmaekers
Yo, questions wrt logging: -) What are the plans to improve the rather primitive logging facilities in zope ? I couldn't find anything in the plan for 2.6, nor on the 3.0 homepage. I think we need at least an extendibl framework with following types of components: - Loggers (fi, file logger,

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-02-28 Thread Chris McDonough
I've modified HTTPResponse and ZServer/HTTPResponse.py to allow for gzip content encoding on a response-by-response basis. I'm mostly using this with xml-rpc, but it could be generalized and combined with a gzipper- cache manager. I'd like this. It would help with the lack of

Re: [Zope-dev] improved logging

2002-02-28 Thread John Ziniti
http://freshmeat.net/projects/log4py/ Romain Slootmaekers wrote: Yo, questions wrt logging: -) What are the plans to improve the rather primitive logging facilities in zope ? I couldn't find anything in the plan for 2.6, nor on the 3.0 homepage. I think we need at least an extendibl

[Zope-dev] Online BTrees documentation released

2002-02-28 Thread Andreas Jung
FYI, I have set up a Wiki that should provide a usable documentation of the Zopes BTrees package. The Wiki is still evolving but it explains (hopefully) the most important datatypes, their API and other helper functions. URL: http://www.zope.org/Members/ajung/BTrees/FrontPage Cheers, Andreas

RE: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-02-28 Thread sean . upton
Hmm... would this still work with Squid or Apache caching in front of Zope? I assume that since each browser can accept different transfer-encodings, this has to be done as close to the browser as possible, otherwise content sent in one transfer encoding would be sent to every user if it was to

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-02-28 Thread John Ziniti
Let's get a discussion started to define 2.6 I'd like to see the ZSyncer Product, or a variant thereof, included in Zope by default. That is, I'd like Synchronization, to a be a default property of Zope objects, so that objects/content can be pushed and pulled between two Zope

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-02-28 Thread Eric Roby
Let's get a discussion started to define 2.6 I'd like to see the ZSyncer Product, or a variant thereof, included in Zope by default. That is, I'd like Synchronization, to a be a default property of Zope objects, so that objects/content can be pushed and pulled between two

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-02-28 Thread Richard Jones
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 15:17, Eric Roby wrote: Let's get a discussion started to define 2.6 I'd like to see the ZSyncer Product, or a variant thereof, included in Zope by default. That is, I'd like Synchronization, to a be a default property of Zope objects, so that

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-02-28 Thread Andre Schubert
Hi, John Ziniti schrieb: Let's get a discussion started to define 2.6 I'd like to see the ZSyncer Product, or a variant thereof, included in Zope by default. That is, I'd like Synchronization, to a be a default property of Zope objects, so that objects/content can be pushed

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-02-28 Thread Lennart Regebro
I wholeheartedly agree that 2.6 needs to be significantly a community effort. While I know that many people are engaged in the Zope 3 effort, we also need to get some people engaged on defining and producing 2.6 in the interim. There is not much on the plan right now, so the possibilities