[Zope-dev] Zope-2.3.3 Python 2.1.3 ? possible or mission impossible

2002-04-25 Thread Dirk Datzert
Hi all, I currently need to build Zope-2.3.3. yeah this is not the latest stable one. I have to build it with Python 2.1.3. Is this possible ? I got and traceback on 'python wo_pcgi.py' Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/src/packages/BUILD/Zope-2.3.3-src/w_pcgi.py, line 111, in ?

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope-2.3.3 Python 2.1.3 ? possible or mission impossible

2002-04-25 Thread Andreas Jung
Don't use 2.1.3 because Zope 2.3 is not supported to run under Python 2.X. Use Python 1.5.2 instead. -aj P.S. and take care with the use of digitial IDs. E.g. Outlook Express refused to reply to this message without valid digital IDs (so this reply goes only to the list and not as CC: to you)

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope-2.3.3 Python 2.1.3 ? possible or mission impossible

2002-04-25 Thread Gilles Lenfant
Hi, It worked perfectly for me. I just got a couple of deprecation warnings when starting zope (should use re and not - unmaintained - regexp module). As far as I can follow the traceback, the BTree problem is off topic for your issue. I suspect you did not install Python 2.1.3 from source, or

[Zope-dev] Fw: Backporting for PHParser to Zope-2.3.3

2002-04-25 Thread Dirk Datzert
- Original Message - From: Dirk Datzert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 1:31 PM Subject: Backporting for PHParser to Zope-2.3.3 Hi Maik, hi all, I want to backport PHParser to Zope-2.3.3 with Python 1.5.2. I currently have

OT digital signature Re: [Zope-dev] Zope-2.3.3 Python 2.1.3 ? possible or mission impossible

2002-04-25 Thread Ross J. Reedstrom
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 06:45:10AM -0400, Andreas Jung wrote: Don't use 2.1.3 because Zope 2.3 is not supported to run under Python 2.X. Use Python 1.5.2 instead. -aj P.S. and take care with the use of digitial IDs. E.g. Outlook Express refused to reply to this message without valid

[Zope-dev] Re: [OT] digital signature

2002-04-25 Thread Lennart Regebro
And this is Dirk's fault, rather than a horrible mis-feature of Outlook Express? It's a stupid misfeature. If you reply to something that is signed, it assume you want to sign yours. You can (at least in OE6) deselect this and send anyway, but it's annoying. Worse is, tha unless you open the

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [OT] digital signature

2002-04-25 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 06:02:19PM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote: I want a *good* mail program. :-/ I can recommend Mutt. ;) -- Martijn Pieters | Software Engineer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com/ | Creators of Zope http://www.zope.org/

[Zope-dev] ts_regex in Zope 2.5.1

2002-04-25 Thread Johan Carlsson [Torped]
Hi, It ts_regex that comes with Zope 2.5.1 seems to rely on regex. Is re thread safe? Also, Plugins from ZPatterns uses ts_regex, is there a later version of Plugins that dones use it? Thanks in advance, Johan Carlsson -- Torped Strategi och Kommunikation AB Johan Carlsson -- [EMAIL

Re: [Zope-dev] ts_regex in Zope 2.5.1

2002-04-25 Thread Andreas Jung
- Original Message - From: Johan Carlsson [Torped] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 14:22 Subject: [Zope-dev] ts_regex in Zope 2.5.1 Hi, It ts_regex that comes with Zope 2.5.1 seems to rely on regex. Is re thread safe? Jup -aj

Re: [Zope-dev] Running methods on Zope startup.

2002-04-25 Thread Myroslav Opyr
Chris McDonough wrote: [snip] There is product ZExternalNews which is working in background from Zope startup. You can take a look there. There are several Startup issues in the code. Regards, Myroslav -- Myroslav Opyr zope.net.ua http://zope.net.ua/ ° Ukrainian Zope Hosting e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [OT] digital signature

2002-04-25 Thread Richard Jones
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 02:02, Lennart Regebro wrote: I want a *good* mail program. :-/ I recommend KMail for those who prefer a GUI reader. http://kmail.kde.org/ It boasts an impressive list of features, including the invaluable SSL POP and SMTP connections and really well-integrated