On Sunday 01 December 2002 3:36 pm, Brian Lloyd wrote:
FYI I'd like to have a 2.6.1 beta out next week. Jeremy is still
looking at a few ZODB bug reports - as soon as he's done we'll
make the beta.
Im not sure this is a good plan.
Jeremy's sortKey changes look like they deserve a
Hi,
http://collector.zope.org/Zope/697
should be set to critical, because it results in loosing essential data.
Case: We store much of our Keywords etc. in multiple-selects.
Everytime a user edits and saves such a multiple-select, all items with
NON-Ascii-characters [german umlaute for
I was needing to use ZSyncher via a proxy server in our firewall. I wrote a
new transport to do this that you might want to incorporate into ZSyncher.
Nice product btw. Very helpful for my setup. Any chance of getting it to
synch bidirectionally?
import urllib
class
It appears that when I currently do 'cvs co Zope' I get a version that
already requires Python 2.2.2. GvR's zdctl.py stuff uses lambdas in a way
that Python 2.1 does not grok.
How can I get at a Python 2.1.3 post 2.6.0 checkout?
Thanks,
Stefan
--
Those who write software only for pay should
Stefan H. Holek wrote:
It appears that when I currently do 'cvs co Zope' I get a version that
already requires Python 2.2.2. GvR's zdctl.py stuff uses lambdas in a
way that Python 2.1 does not grok.
How can I get at a Python 2.1.3 post 2.6.0 checkout?
You have to specify the correct branch:
Yes, cvs co Zope checks out the HEAD, which is 2.7 and requires python 2.2.x.
Try: co -r Zope-2_6-branch Zope
Which will give you the 2.6 maintenance branch.
hth,
-Casey
On Monday 02 December 2002 10:42 am, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
It appears that when I currently do 'cvs co Zope' I get a
Hi all,
I've a little bit tricky problem:
How could I wrap a request of an inexistent object and handle request
in a transparent way using a defined method? I've searched about
__before_publishing_traverse__ and __bobo_traverse__ but them are too few
documented (or I didn't understand
If this is critical for you, then you will probably need to develop a patch
for it in order for it to make it into 2.6.1; unless anyone else wants to
volunteer. I don't feel comfortable enough with the unicode converters to do
this.
-Casey
On Monday 02 December 2002 05:46 am, Maik Jablonski
Casey Duncan wrote:
If this is critical for you, then you will probably need to develop a patch
for it in order for it to make it into 2.6.1; unless anyone else wants to
volunteer. I don't feel comfortable enough with the unicode converters to do
this.
For me it's critical, but maybe for
If you want an object to be able to handle calls to undefined methods, you'll
probably need to use a __getattr__ hook. They can be a little tricky to get
right (you want to filter out names that start with _ or aq or else
you'll be in trouble), and they don't have access to acquisition, but
On Monday 02 December 2002 4:11 pm, Maik Jablonski wrote:
I don't have much experience with the unicode-converters too... that's
my problem for this issue...:-(
I had seen this bug on the list, but hant spotted that it was a
unicode-related. I will try to take a look sometime this week.
Casey == Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Casey If you want an object to be able to handle calls to undefined methods,
Casey you'll=20 probably need to use a __getattr__ hook. They can be a
Casey little tricky to get20 right (you want to filter out names that start
Casey with _ or aq or
Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Monday 02 December 2002 4:11 pm, Maik Jablonski wrote:
I don't have much experience with the unicode-converters too... that's
my problem for this issue...:-(
I had seen this bug on the list, but hant spotted that it was a
unicode-related. I will try to take a
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 5:50 pm, Brian Lloyd wrote:
FYI I'd like to have a 2.6.1 beta out next week. Jeremy is still
looking at a few ZODB bug reports - as soon as he's done we'll
make the beta.
Im not sure this is a good plan.
Jeremy's
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 18:25:26 +
Toby Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feel free to do that if it works for you, but a patch for this approach will
not be accepted into the standard Zope. See this bug report for an
explanation of why this contradict's Zope's current unicode approach:
TD == Toby Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TD A bug in the transaction manager would be really bad news. I
TD would have thought it appropriate to resolve these problems and
TD leave at least a few weeks of beta test before release.
I'm looking into the problem, as I reported on
16 matches
Mail list logo
