Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Nightly Zope 3 Binary Compiles for WIndows

2004-05-06 Thread Chris Withers
Tim Peters wrote: If they have the .pyd files, they can run Zope and fix problems they find in the .py files. They have the .pyd files now. I'm keeping them up to date, and Max M wrote a clear howto (which references the .pyd Zip files on zope.org):

Re: [Zope-dev] How should an ideal Zope IDE look like?

2004-05-06 Thread Chris Withers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: More important is the second point: Having such a tool would bring a HUGE amount of value added to Zope. Mega, super huge. Sounds like the opportunity for a commercial tool. It's not NEEDED, but it makes life a LOT easier, and so would give any company with it

Re: [Zope-dev] Weird couldn't load state on Zope 2.6.2

2004-05-06 Thread Chris Withers
Dieter Maurer wrote: An incredibly old problem. I wrote at least 2 threads about it (one with Andreas Tille with about 10 messages). Please search the mailing list archives ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), for details... I tried: http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Alists.zope.org+dieter+andreas+zsql+-jung

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Change in repository approach to software sharing

2004-05-06 Thread Chris Withers
Jim Fulton wrote: We'll also have a top-level ZConfig project directory. The trunk of the ZConfig Python package will be in ZConfig/trunk/src/ZConfig. If we create a tag T1 of ZConfig, then the Python package for that tag will be in ZConfig/tags/T1/src/ZConfig. The /src/ in the above paths seems

Re: [Zope-dev] Subversion

2004-05-06 Thread Chris Withers
Lennart Regebro wrote: Well... Non-issue it is not. But it makes it much less of an issue. It would still be nice to have server-side configurations of defalts, though. Yeah, but from what Jim said, that's something the svn guys are aiming to do. I guess the best thing would be to hassle/help

Re: [reportlab-users] Re: [Zope-dev] Subversion

2004-05-06 Thread Chris Withers
(cc'ing this to zope-dev in case this is of interest to them too) Robin Becker wrote: Chris Withers wrote: Tim Peters wrote: . Cool :-) Glad to find this one is a non-issue! Chris I hacked cvs2svn.py and seem to be getting it to look up the b tag in place of the mime-types stuff which

Re: [Zope-dev] Bug day report

2004-05-06 Thread Chris Withers
Dieter Maurer wrote: True. But if they are not planned to be fixed at all, then they should be closed. You risk to get less bug reports in the collector... Filing a (good) bug report takes quite a bit of time. When you have gotten rejections for several bug reports (that took you

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Chris Withers
Ken Manheimer wrote: Done. The piece you were missing is that the categories are actually states in the collector_issue_workflow. I added a Wontfix state and a refuse transition (bringing to a total of three the transitions by which issues are dodged:), and hooked them into the existing

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Chris Withers
Chris Withers wrote: Ken Manheimer wrote: Done. The piece you were missing is that the categories are actually states in the collector_issue_workflow. I added a Wontfix state and a refuse transition (bringing to a total of three the transitions by which issues are dodged:), and hooked them

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Donnerstag, 6. Mai 2004 12:37 Uhr +0100 Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ken Manheimer wrote: Done. The piece you were missing is that the categories are actually states in the collector_issue_workflow. I added a Wontfix state and a refuse transition (bringing to a total of three

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Change in repository approach to software sharing

2004-05-06 Thread Jim Fulton
Chris Withers wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: ... Now, when we set up the Zope 3 repository, we will create the ZConfig package in Zope 3 by copying a *tag* from the ZConfig project: svn copy svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/ZConfig/tags/T1/src/ZConfig \

RE: [Zope-dev] How should an ideal Zope IDE look like?

2004-05-06 Thread Jean-Francois . Doyon
Well, I suspect the interest in this type of tool might be big enough to allow for the open Source model to apply in an efficient manner ? Depends on the skills required to bring it to life. I've started using Eclipse lately, and I just love it, I've combined PyDT/PyDEV + Subclipse + XMLBuddy

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Chris McDonough
Thanks for this Ken! On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 07:57, Chris Withers wrote: Chris Withers wrote: Ken Manheimer wrote: Done. The piece you were missing is that the categories are actually states in the collector_issue_workflow. I added a Wontfix state and a refuse transition (bringing

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Ken Manheimer
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Chris Withers wrote: Chris Withers wrote: Yay! Does this mean we have a fully functional wont fix state now? It does appear to, woohoo! Can we change the action name from Refuse to Won't Fix? I took a while to find it... All the actions are verbs, won't fix is

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Ken Manheimer
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Andreas Jung wrote: --On Donnerstag, 6. Mai 2004 12:37 Uhr +0100 Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ken Manheimer wrote: Done. The piece you were missing is that the categories are actually states in the collector_issue_workflow. I added a Wontfix state and

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Lennart Regebro
From: Ken Manheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] All the actions are verbs, won't fix is not a verb. Can you suggest a verb the more clearly indicates the result is won't fix? Tough one... Live with Ignore Keep this bug as is Zenify Featurize (as in This is not a bug, it's a feature) Shove under

Re: [Zope-dev] Bug day report

2004-05-06 Thread Casey Duncan
On Thu, 6 May 2004 10:45:03 -0400 Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [..] On the Python bug tracker, I don't close vague bug reports instantly. Instead I add a note, saying that unless more information is added, the bug will be closed a month later. It's rare that more info gets added then,

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 11:56, Lennart Regebro wrote: From: Ken Manheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] All the actions are verbs, won't fix is not a verb. Can you suggest a verb the more clearly indicates the result is won't fix? Tough one... Live with Ignore Keep this bug as is Zenify

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Paul Winkler
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 04:56:42PM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote: Featurize (as in This is not a bug, it's a feature) That's my favorite bug-closing technique! Closed works pretty well for that one, though in order to really justify it I feel compelled to add comments, docstrings, and/or help

[Zope-dev] (no subject)

2004-05-06 Thread Dominique Lederer
hi a call a method with this path: /poll/question/answer/testMethod in my poll class i defined a method which returns self.getId() but it shows me always my poll ID not the expected answer id i would like to access the id's like context.getId() does when working in the ZMI (i am new to

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Lennart Regebro
Or maybe Deny as a action? Sounds less angry than reject and refuse. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists -

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Jamie Heilman
Ken Manheimer wrote: All the actions are verbs, won't fix is not a verb. How about 'bikeshed' ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists -

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.X Session problems

2004-05-06 Thread Kris Erickson
No, that's not the problem; in THEORY that's what is happening, but in reality there is no way that this is the case; We just unrolled a registration system with participation rates at or around 100 to 200 participants per month; At any given time, monitoring the session data container, there

[Zope-dev] Zope and ESI

2004-05-06 Thread Ganesha Shanmuganathan
Hi all, Has anybody used ESI with zope ? I know that ESI support was added to squid and the project was funded by Zope corporation. But I could not find much information on the project after that. We are planing to experiment with ESI for one of our projects and if required implement a

[Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Casey Duncan
On Thu, 06 May 2004 12:09:18 -0300 Leonardo Rochael Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 11:56, Lennart Regebro wrote: From: Ken Manheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] All the actions are verbs, won't fix is not a verb. Can you suggest a verb the more clearly indicates the result

RE: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Tim Peters
[Ken Manheimer] All the actions are verbs, won't fix is not a verb. Can you suggest a verb the more clearly indicates the result is won't fix? Sorry, I got lost on the first sentence: what difference does it make to anything whether they're verbs, adjectives, a mix, ...? They're all just

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope and ESI

2004-05-06 Thread Chris McDonough
I have used Squid 3's ESI with Zope... it works pretty well. There is no support built in to Zope to generate ESI tags; you will either need to include them in your templates or build a layer of indirection (maybe through ZPT macros?) that knows to either render the full page or insert ESI tags

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Ken Manheimer
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Lennart Regebro wrote: From: Ken Manheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] All the actions are verbs, won't fix is not a verb. Can you suggest a verb the more clearly indicates the result is won't fix? Tough one... Live with Ignore Keep this bug as is Zenify Featurize (as

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Ken Manheimer
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 11:56, Lennart Regebro wrote: From: Ken Manheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] All the actions are verbs, won't fix is not a verb. Can you suggest a verb the more clearly indicates the result is won't fix? Tough one...

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-06 Thread Ken Manheimer
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Lennart Regebro wrote: Or maybe Deny as a action? Sounds less angry than reject and refuse. What's being denied - the request to fix the bug, or the validity of the bug report? Refuse suggests only that we are refusing to fix the bug, there's no implication that the bug

RE: [Zope-dev] Segfault and Deadlock

2004-05-06 Thread alangmead
I've submitted two patches to the python patch collector http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=949332group_id=5470atid=305470 is something that should probably work with any pthreads based Unix implementation. It simply unblocks the type of signals that are normally

[Zope-dev] XML-RPC incorrect 404 return code

2004-05-06 Thread Alan Milligan
Hi, I'm doing some stuff using Zope as an XML-RPC server, and have come across a rather interesting bug. If the method doesn't exist on the Zope server, Zope returns an xmlrpclib.Fault with a faultCode= -1. This completely trips out my XML-RPC client which was rather expecting an

RE: [Zope-dev] XML-RPC incorrect 404 return code

2004-05-06 Thread zope
I reported this a few month ago with a patch and was told that it'll be applied 'soon': http://collector.zope.org/Zope/1175 IMHO the xml-rpc error handling is a mess. You can't define your own standard_error_message like method, sometimes it returns html code, sets the status code to 200 even if

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.X Session problems

2004-05-06 Thread Michael Dunstan
On 7/05/2004, at 5:15 AM, Kris Erickson wrote: No, that's not the problem; in THEORY that's what is happening, but in reality there is no way that this is the case; We just unrolled a registration system with participation rates at or around 100 to 200 participants per month; At any given time,

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope 2.X Session problems

2004-05-06 Thread Tres Seaver
Michael Dunstan wrote: On 7/05/2004, at 5:15 AM, Kris Erickson wrote: No, that's not the problem; in THEORY that's what is happening, but in reality there is no way that this is the case; We just unrolled a registration system with participation rates at or around 100 to 200 participants per

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Zope 2.X Session problems

2004-05-06 Thread Michael Dunstan
On 7/05/2004, at 4:39 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: Michael Dunstan wrote: On 7/05/2004, at 5:15 AM, Kris Erickson wrote: No, that's not the problem; in THEORY that's what is happening, but in reality there is no way that this is the case; We just unrolled a registration system with participation rates