Jim Fulton wrote:
I think you'll find this doesn't work when
svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/Zope3/trunk/src/ZConfig already exists.
That's not relevent to the example, as, in the example, we are
creating it for the first time.
Yep, I know, but I've been there, and you feel great after the first
Casey Duncan wrote:
I will try to tread a little lighter on the Reject button and add a
comment requesting clarification regardless of age. If I don't hear any
for a month or so, then the bug will be closed.
Great, don't suppose you can do a mind-meld with Andreas and Maik and get that
point
Tim Peters wrote:
While that *should* be a good example, it isn't: I only knew that bug
existed because someone closed it on Bug Day (and I'm subscribed to the
Collectors, and read the email they generate).
*bangs head against desk*
Some bugs are so vaguely described nobody could guess -- and
Dieter Maurer wrote:
2. Do you know any way of searching the list archvies that exclude the month.txt
files? These are usually spurious due to being so large...
Maybe, you try a different search engine. Maybe Gmane?
Searching gmane.comp.web.zope.general for dieter andreas load state returned
Ken Manheimer wrote:
All the actions are verbs, won't fix is not a verb.
Do we have to be this pedantic?
Wont' fix says what it does, it's close enough to verb usage for me:
I won't fix that
verb the more clearly indicates the result is won't fix? (While the
distinction between refuse and
Ken Manheimer wrote:
How is that better than what i implemented, Refuse? (Or maybe you
missed that, since it's not in the excerpt context?) As the discussion
has proceeded i'm becoming more convinced that refuse is fine...
...and I'm more convinced that wont fix is better. This is what
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO the xml-rpc error handling is a mess. You can't define your own
standard_error_message like method, sometimes it returns html code, sets
the status code to 200 even if there's an error, etc. Is there an
intention to fix these in 2.X?
You appear to have an itch... and
Yves Moisan wrote:
A bit off topic here : browsing the repository, I thought it would be
nice if svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope3/trunk could be recognized as
a protocol by Mozilla.
http://protozilla.mozdev.org/
seb
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
From: Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How about removing the ability for people to post bugs withotu specifying
n
email address? And, if they do specify an email address, using that to
contact
them by sending notification mails to it?
At least, warning them that bugs without email adresses are
We're using a shopping cart model; sessions only get created if the user
'adds' a workshop to their cart.
Unless there's anything I'm missing in Plone... the _ZopeId cookie
doesn't seem to start up a session (lazy data container?) until a script
actually creates says session['key'] = value...
On Fri, 07 May 2004 09:56:45 +0100
Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Peters wrote:
While that *should* be a good example, it isn't: I only knew that
bug existed because someone closed it on Bug Day (and I'm subscribed
to the Collectors, and read the email they generate).
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Tim Peters wrote:
[Ken Manheimer]
All the actions are verbs, won't fix is not a verb. Can you
suggest a verb the more clearly indicates the result is won't
fix?
Sorry, I got lost on the first sentence: what difference does it make to
anything whether they're
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Chris Withers wrote:
Ken Manheimer wrote:
All the actions are verbs, won't fix is not a verb.
Do we have to be this pedantic?
I wasn't meaning to be pedeantic. Sometimes inconsistencies in tense,
grammatical form, etc, can make a web form unbeably confusing - what's
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Casey Duncan wrote:
On Fri, 07 May 2004 09:56:45 +0100
Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Peters wrote:
While that *should* be a good example, it isn't: I only knew that
bug existed because someone closed it on Bug Day (and I'm subscribed
to the
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 09:33, Casey Duncan wrote:
On Thu, 6 May 2004 22:30:49 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I reported this a few month ago with a patch and was told that it'll
be applied 'soon':
http://collector.zope.org/Zope/1175
Who told you that? I see no comment on that issue.
Hi,
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:04:34 +0200, Maik Jablonski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zope2 isn't maintained very well anymore due to limited ressources(bug
fixes, documentation, see mail from Andreas), but Zope3 isn'tproduction
ready at all. So if you talk to people making the
You appear to have an itch... and you know what open source
says about itches ;-)
Then I will try to fix these issues, I just wasn't sure if anyone cares.
Regards,
Sandor
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--On Freitag, 7. Mai 2004 19:26 Uhr +0300 Alex V. Koval
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just need to know if anybody else interested into better look of
zope.org
site? And how this could be done...
Basically by volunteering to help out with the one or the task.
See http://www.zope.org/About/ how to
cvs.zope.org is wedged - you can connect to it (ping, web, ssh) but not
get any further. We've got a call in for attention, hopefully it'll be
back available soon...
Ken
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 07 May 2004 01:50 pm, Ken Manheimer wrote:
cvs.zope.org is wedged - you can connect to it (ping, web, ssh) but not
get any further. We've got a call in for attention, hopefully it'll be
back available soon...
Yay! It's working again! Ken, you're my hero. ;-)
-Fred
--
Ken Manheimer wrote at 2004-5-7 09:42 -0400:
...
It can sometimes pay off in workflow configuration to consistently pick
verbs that describe the actions in a generic way
You can view won't fix as a verb, like in
we won't fix this bug.
--
Dieter
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Ken Manheimer wrote at 2004-5-7 09:42 -0400:
...
It can sometimes pay off in workflow configuration to consistently pick
verbs that describe the actions in a generic way
You can view won't fix as a verb, like in
we won't fix this bug.
Well,
22 matches
Mail list logo
