Re: [Zope-dev] NOT operator in Unindex.

--On Donnerstag, 23. September 2004 23:51 Uhr +0200 Johan Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: Why don't you use AdvancedQuery+ManageableIndes by DM? Sure. Why would that be preferred? And is there any chance of AdvancedQuery+ManageableIndes will make it to the Zope Core? I do

Re: [Zope-dev] NOT operator in Unindex.

Andreas Jung wrote: Why don't you use AdvancedQuery+ManageableIndes by DM? Sure. Why would that be preferred? And is there any chance of AdvancedQuery+ManageableIndes will make it to the Zope Core? My exampel extends Field- and KeywordIndex and any other index based on Unindex without changing back

Re: [Zope-dev] NOT operator in Unindex.

Why don't you use AdvancedQuery+ManageableIndes by DM? -aj --On Donnerstag, 23. September 2004 13:24 Uhr +0200 Johan Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I've been hacking FieldIndex and KeywordIndex to allow it to take the operator not to exclude object that matches from the result. As it see

[Zope-dev] NOT operator in Unindex.

Hi, I've been hacking FieldIndex and KeywordIndex to allow it to take the operator not to exclude object that matches from the result. As it seems to me it would be possible to patch the Unindex with the changes I've made. Is this something that could be added to the core? Examples of special n