Re: [Zope-dev] Re: ZCatalog getObject broken

2005-03-18 Thread Florent Guillaume
Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A, B and C are folders nested in each other i.e. A/B/C. A user does not have access to A and B but he does have access to C. If getObject uses restrictedTraverse it returns None immediately when traversing A, even though the user is allowed to access

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/ - Applied patch for

2005-03-18 Thread Martijn Faassen
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:34:10AM -0500, Tim Peters wrote: [Sidnei da Silva] Humm... we are trying to push a Zope 2.8 beta out, do you have or know of plans to use ZODB 3.4 with Zope 2.8? Yes. Jim needs to fix ZClasses for 2.8 too. ZODB 3.4 requires some Zope(3) features, like

[Zope-dev] Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Brian Lloyd
Hi all, There have been a number of threads going on today re: Zope X3.1 feature freeze and the 2.8 effort. I'd like to clarify some decisions re: Zope 2.8 Jim is the product mgr for Zope 3 and I'm it for Zope 2, so hopefully this can be considered authoritative and end part of this thread

[Zope-dev] Zope 2.8 + Five post-sprint status

2005-03-18 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hey everybody, We're wrapping up here at a very pleasant and productive Zope 2/3/Five sprint here in Paris. We've accomplished quite a lot, and we'll let you hear what this is in more detail soon. We've spent a lot of time with Zope 2.8, integrating Zope X3.0 and Five into it. Our work is on

Re: [Zope-dev] Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Freitag, 18. März 2005 11:22 Uhr -0500 Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - In the next few days at most, after a few loose ends are wrapped up, we'll ask Andreas to make a 2.8 beta 1 release. While Jim still has a few things to do, people will be able to start using the

Re: [Zope-dev] Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Martijn Faassen
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:22:26AM -0500, Brian Lloyd wrote: [snip] - Zope 2.8 will include X3.0 (not X3.1) - The Z3 developers will have *no* extra burden or responsibility to support X3.0 beyond what they would normally do in the normal course of maintaining it for

Re: [Zope-dev] Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Lennart Regebro
Brian Lloyd wrote: Hi all, There have been a number of threads going on today re: Zope X3.1 feature freeze and the 2.8 effort. I'd like to clarify some decisions re: Zope 2.8 Very much excellent! This, Jims announcement of the April 2 feature freeze datem and Stephans statement that he was

Re: [Zope-dev] Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Martijn Faassen
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 05:42:05PM +0100, Andreas Jung wrote: --On Freitag, 18. M?rz 2005 11:22 Uhr -0500 Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - In the next few days at most, after a few loose ends are wrapped up, we'll ask Andreas to make a 2.8 beta 1 release. While Jim still has

Re: [Zope-dev] Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Freitag, 18. März 2005 18:03 Uhr +0100 Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 05:42:05PM +0100, Andreas Jung wrote: --On Freitag, 18. M?rz 2005 11:22 Uhr -0500 Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - In the next few days at most, after a few loose ends are

Re: [Zope-dev] Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Jim Fulton
Martijn Faassen wrote: ... Do some of these have something to do with a change to Python 2.4, by the way? No. It's a bit unclear to me what version of Python this release is targetting. 2.3 Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (540)

Re: [Zope-dev] Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Jim Fulton
Andreas Jung wrote: --On Freitag, 18. März 2005 18:03 Uhr +0100 Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 05:42:05PM +0100, Andreas Jung wrote: --On Freitag, 18. M?rz 2005 11:22 Uhr -0500 Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - In the next few days at most, after a few

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Tim Peters
[Martijn Faassen] ... Do some of these have something to do with a change to Python 2.4, by the way? [Jim Fulton] No. If you're using the Python 2.4 line, some of the security changes triggered a Python bug that will be fixed in 2.4.1 (which is currently in release candidate 2 status).

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Chris McDonough
- The Z3 developers will have *no* extra burden or responsibility to support X3.0 beyond what they would normally do in the normal course of maintaining it for Z3-only applications. In other words, it is not the responsibility of Z3 devs to make sure Z2 tests pass,

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
- It *will be* the responsibility of the Zope 2 devs to make sure Z2 works with the version of Z3 bundled at the time. snip It'd be great if active Z3 developers could actually help make new releases of Z2 once Five is integrated but the above makes it sound like a we'll throw it over

[Zope-dev] RE: Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Brian Lloyd
Chris wrote: I assume these caveats are spelled out here because Z3 developers don't want to slow down Z3 development to test/maintain Z2 compatibility. I know a lot about Z2 code, but I know very little about Z3 code. I'd like that to change, but it's likely that I'll just not have the

[Zope-dev] RE: Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Chris McDonough
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 13:45, Brian Lloyd wrote: A lot of time was spent talking about these (legitimate) concerns - unfortunately it will probably take a little time to distill all of that communication to the community. But let me take a shot ;) There are several different groups, with

[Zope-dev] RE: [Zope3-dev] RE: Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Brian Lloyd
There are a significant and growing number of people in group B. Yup, that makes sense. Are these assumed to also be the folks who will try to make sure that new Z3 releases make it in to Z2 via Five? I guess what I'm driving at is that I'd hate to eventually have a very old version

[Zope-dev] RE: [Zope3-dev] RE: Clarification re: Zope X3.1, 2.8

2005-03-18 Thread Chris McDonough
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 14:44, Brian Lloyd wrote: It won't turn into a fork. Right now there is a lot of discussion going on about the 'right' way to manage Z3 releases -- we'll need to decide on a Z2 release policy that takes that into account. I think the goal for Z2 will be to include the

[Zope-dev] Re: Overriding Products

2005-03-18 Thread Derrick Hudson
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:49:01 +0100, Martijn Jacobs wrote: Hello guys. I have a question regarding product importing in zope 2.7.x, as since zope 2.7 this part is way more flexible then it was before. I'd like to accomplish the next situation : - A Zope base installation has Product X

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/ - Applied patch for

2005-03-18 Thread Tim Peters
[Martijn Faassen] Oh, also please note that we're merging zope.interfaces and zope.testing into Zope 2.8 already. So once we merge that branch (today, we expect), AFAICT, that didn't land today, at least not on the trunk. ZODB 3.4 could be merged in. But I'm worried that there are other

[Zope-dev] Cookie problem with mySqlUserFolder

2005-03-18 Thread Aruna Kathiria
Title: Cookie problem with mySqlUserFolder Hello everyone: I am facing the problem regarding cookie. One of our website uses mySqlUserFolder. Problem is if user logs on one computer, and if he/she comes again on same computer, computer remembers him/her. That is good as it is what we

[Zope-dev] Parrot

2005-03-18 Thread Alan Milligan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Parrot 0.1.2 was released a couple of weeks ago. According to the release notes, there's now better python support, separated into dynaclasses. Unfortunately, I haven't really managed to keep up with the Parrot project, but I think it quite possibly