On 1 Jul 2005, at 04:58, Fred Drake wrote:
Since using an additional configuration file is possible (and quite
easy in Zope 2, since the location of the instance is so easy to
discern, I'm not convinced it's actually important to support
embedding the configuration for 3rd-party components into
FWIW, I don't know if it helps at all, but there's a concrete example of
allowing a 3rd-party product to add a section to zope.conf via %import
in the ClockServer product at
http://www.plope.com/software/ClockServer/ . It sounds from your
description exactly like what you want to do, although it
I'd like to propose/sponsor/promise-to-finish the following for
inclusion in 2.9. If anyone has fears/doubts/problems with specific
things, please let me know. I can also start a 2.9 project on the wiki
with this info; if other folks have features they want, maybe they can
post them here and we
Note that this article is now available without a subscription at
http://lwn.net/Articles/139770/
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:08 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:05 +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
From what I read from Rob in an interview in LWN, membership to the
Oops, wrong URL! This is the right one: http://lwn.net/Articles/139955/
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:08 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:05 +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
From what I read from Rob in an interview in LWN, membership to the
foundation will be
On 7/1/05, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I don't know if it helps at all, but there's a concrete example of
allowing a 3rd-party product to add a section to zope.conf via %import
in the ClockServer product at
http://www.plope.com/software/ClockServer/ . It sounds from your
Did you bump up the thread stack size for the python you're running Zope
with? This sounds like that problem. If you search zope.org for FreeBSD -
I have a note on how I fix it.
Andrew
--
Zope Managed Hosting
Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
(540) 361-1700
-Original Message-
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 10:54 -0300, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| The general case of being able to add a section (or anything else)
| isn't covered by the current implementation.
That is right. I've just learnt that the hard way *wink*.
Oh. ;-)
- C
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 08:27:02AM -0400, Fred Drake wrote:
| On 7/1/05, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| FWIW, I don't know if it helps at all, but there's a concrete example of
| allowing a 3rd-party product to add a section to zope.conf via %import
| in the ClockServer product at
|
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:58:08PM -0400, Fred Drake wrote:
| On 6/30/05, Sidnei da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Gosh, that looks too nice to be true. I will try that out tomorrow and
| write out a how-to on zope.org if it works out.
|
| It is too good to be true; sorry.
|
| Well, it is
On 7/1/05, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That just has the disadvantage that you're increasing the number of
configuration files to maintain in an instance. If it's imported and
used in zope.conf at leaast there's just one file to deal with...
This is true. Is that really important,
Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose/sponsor/promise-to-finish the following for
inclusion in 2.9. If anyone has fears/doubts/problems with specific
things, please let me know. I can also start a 2.9 project on the wiki
with this info; if other folks have features
Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose/sponsor/promise-to-finish the following for
inclusion in 2.9.
Here's something else that would be nice: PAS.
Although it hasn't been tested much, so we should include it as early as
possible in the 2.9 cycle (i.e., why not now ? :)
I've heard of this earlier, but never experienced it until now. :)
And yes, that was the issue! :)
Thanks,
Morten
Andrew Sawyers wrote:
Did you bump up the thread stack size for the python you're running Zope
with? This sounds like that problem. If you search zope.org for FreeBSD -
I
On 1 Jul 2005, at 17:15, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Here's something else that would be nice: PAS.
Although it hasn't been tested much, so we should include it as
early as
possible in the 2.9 cycle (i.e., why not now ? :)
Maybe not right at this moment... but I would like to see that, too.
15 matches
Mail list logo
